2020
DOI: 10.3390/ijms21082895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Target Recognition by TRAF1 and TRAF2

Abstract: Although TRAF1 and TRAF2 share common receptors and have extremely conserved amino acid residues, recent studies have shown that key differences in receptor binding preferences with different affinities exist, which might be important for their different functions in TRAF-mediated signal transduction. To better understand TRAF1 and TRAF2 signaling, we analyzed and compared their receptor binding-affinities. Our study revealed that TRADD, TANK, and caspase-2 bind to both TRAF1 and TRAF2 with different affinitie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then explored the detailed mechanism of trimerization at the atomic level. The comparison of CC domain structures of TRAF family members, which were collected from the Protein Data Bank archive (PDB) or computationally generated by AlphaFold ( Kim and Park, 2020 ), revealed that TRAF7 has a long CC region similar to TRAF1/2 CC region ( Supplementary Figure S4 ), indicating the potential for occupying a significant space and engaging in interactions with other proteins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then explored the detailed mechanism of trimerization at the atomic level. The comparison of CC domain structures of TRAF family members, which were collected from the Protein Data Bank archive (PDB) or computationally generated by AlphaFold ( Kim and Park, 2020 ), revealed that TRAF7 has a long CC region similar to TRAF1/2 CC region ( Supplementary Figure S4 ), indicating the potential for occupying a significant space and engaging in interactions with other proteins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%