2002
DOI: 10.1109/20.996245
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of table models of electromagnetic actuators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Electromagnetic torque changes over time in a complex manner with the instantaneous value of the coil current and the motion speed of the core and, thus, design using a static load is difficult. Because of this, in this section, we will discuss a method for calculating the transient motion of the tri‐stable swing solenoid .…”
Section: Investigation Of Tri‐stable Swing Solenoidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electromagnetic torque changes over time in a complex manner with the instantaneous value of the coil current and the motion speed of the core and, thus, design using a static load is difficult. Because of this, in this section, we will discuss a method for calculating the transient motion of the tri‐stable swing solenoid .…”
Section: Investigation Of Tri‐stable Swing Solenoidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some authors recognized that the algebraic expression for the magnetic force is not simple [4,25], and the models based on the finite-element method compute such force from the spatial distribution of the magnetic field [8][9][10][11][12][13]. The armature weight will be considered because the contactor will be modeled as it is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Modeling Without the Effect Of The Shading Ringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today they are many applications of electro-magnetic actuators, including fuel injection control in the production of molds and dies, and others in the automotive, aerospace and aeronautical industries. The paper introduces a table model method to compare the different types of EMA (Melgoza & Rodger, 2002;Quintana, Ciurana, & Teixidor, 2008).…”
Section: Modal Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%