2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-908x.2000.tb00772.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Synchrotron Radiation X‐Ray Fluorescence with Conventional Techniques for the Analysis of Sedimentary Samples

Abstract: A comparison is made of elemental analyses of sediment samples (lake bottom sediments and sediments from the petroliferous Bazhenovka Formation) by five competitive methods (synchrotron radiation X‐ray fluorescence (SR‐XRF), INAA, ICP‐MS, AAS and traditional XRF). The object of this study was to identify the most suitable analytical techniques for applications in sedimentary geochemistry. Advantages and shortcomings of the five techniques were considered with respect to applications related to studies of palae… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we performed "intrinsic" tests for the accuracy and stability of SR-XRF (Table 2) by measuring the U and Th concentrations (C SR-XRF ) in reference materials SDO-1 and BIL-1 (certified/recommended values are from Govindaraju 1994). The photo peak of Sr in BIL-1 was used as an internal standard to calibrate the coefficients from equations 1 and 2, following the procedure in Phedorin et al (2000c); then, using the calculated values of U and Th concentrations in BIL-1, we obtained the respective values in SDO-1 (without internal standard). Table 2 also gives the values of the lower detection limit for the determination of U and Th.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we performed "intrinsic" tests for the accuracy and stability of SR-XRF (Table 2) by measuring the U and Th concentrations (C SR-XRF ) in reference materials SDO-1 and BIL-1 (certified/recommended values are from Govindaraju 1994). The photo peak of Sr in BIL-1 was used as an internal standard to calibrate the coefficients from equations 1 and 2, following the procedure in Phedorin et al (2000c); then, using the calculated values of U and Th concentrations in BIL-1, we obtained the respective values in SDO-1 (without internal standard). Table 2 also gives the values of the lower detection limit for the determination of U and Th.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The element abundances were measured in 30 mg fine powder (b 50 μm) samples compressed into 6 mm pellets at 120-150 kg/cm 2 , with the samples of dolomitic limestone (SI-1, SI-2 provided by the Vinogradov Institute of Geochemistry (Irkutsk) used as external standards (Phedorin et al, 2000)). The analytical precision was about 10-15%.…”
Section: Sampling and Analytical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a 1-year resolution (in some cases, even a 1-season one) with time intervals of a few thousands of years. [24][25][26] The resulting spectra were processed using the program AXIL (Canberra Packard, Benelux). Taking the intensity profiles in the core into account, we isolated the intervals of constant concentration of each of the chemical elements of interest, the so-called 'shelves'.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%