2006
DOI: 10.1118/1.2256069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of synchrotron radiation and conventional x-ray microcomputed tomography for assessing trabecular bone microarchitecture of human femoral heads

Abstract: Microcomputed tomography (microCT) produces three-dimensional (3D) images of trabecular bone. We compared conventional microCT (CmicroCT) with a polychromatic x-ray cone beam to synchrotron radiation (SR) microCT with a monochromatic parallel beam for assessing trabecular bone microarchitecture of 14 subchondral femoral head specimens from patients with osteoarthritis (n=10) or osteoporosis (n=4). SRmicroCT images with a voxel size of 10.13 microm were reconstructed from 900 2D radiographic projections (angula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(62 reference statements)
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible that the decrease in trabecular bone thickness would make the decreased voxel size have more influence on observed trabecular volume fraction. Previous examinations comparing synchrotron radiation and conventional microCT in animals have not presented quantitative results and thus do not allow for comparison (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the decrease in trabecular bone thickness would make the decreased voxel size have more influence on observed trabecular volume fraction. Previous examinations comparing synchrotron radiation and conventional microCT in animals have not presented quantitative results and thus do not allow for comparison (37).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micro-CT has proven to be of value for research involving bone [Wong et al, 1995;Davis and Wong, 1996;Nuzzo et al, 2002a, b;Postnov et al, 2003;Chappard et al, 2006] and dental hard tissues, enamel as well as dentine [Kinney et al, 1994;Davis and Wong, 1996;Hahn et al, 2004;Luedemann et al, 2005;Plotino et al, 2006;Huang et al, 2007;Willmott et al, 2007]. Micro-CT is potentially capable of providing quantitative data, but in order to achieve this a reliable means of calibration is required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the study of bone architecture and density drove the early developments of micro-CT systems (Ruegsegger et al, 1996). When applied to in vitro studies, the spatial resolution of dedicated benchtop systems approaches that provided by synchrotron sources (Boyd et al, 2006;Chappard et al, 2006). For in vivo applications, the acquisition protocol is constrained by dose to the animal (Ford et al, 2003), leading to a reduction in spatial resolution.…”
Section: Bone Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%