Future Information Engineering 2014
DOI: 10.2495/icie130581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of SVM and ANN classifier for mammogram classification using ICA features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accuracy has priority for testing the performance of mammogram classification system. The accuracy of proposed system is greater than the system by Phadke and Rege [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Accuracy has priority for testing the performance of mammogram classification system. The accuracy of proposed system is greater than the system by Phadke and Rege [8].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Though the accuracy obtained in the proposed method is slightly less than the accuracy reported by Shanthi & Murali Bhaskaran [9], proposed method is capable of detecting five types of abnormalities namely microcalcifications (CALC), circumscribed masses (MASS), spiculated masses (SPIC) architectural distortions (ARCH) and ill-defined or miscellaneous masses (MISC). In the work by Phadke & Rege [8], sensitivity is higher than the sensitivity of the proposed system. As the former technique classifies only malignant samples whereas proposed system classifies both malignant and benign abnormalities from normal samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation