1998
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1998.5584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Surface and Net Charge Densities of Poly(acrylonitrile) Membranes Grafted with Ionic Monomers: Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic Effects of Graft Chain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These fluxes can now be compared directly with the experimental data (Figs. 3-5) and reproduce some of the observed trends when the membrane fixed charge concentration and pK a values obtained in previous independent experimental studies (9)(10)(11) are introduced into the model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These fluxes can now be compared directly with the experimental data (Figs. 3-5) and reproduce some of the observed trends when the membrane fixed charge concentration and pK a values obtained in previous independent experimental studies (9)(10)(11) are introduced into the model.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Single-charged PAN membranes were prepared by graft polymerization with the initiation of a redox system, i.e., FeSO 4 -H 2 O 2 for AAc (AAc-grafted PAN) and NaHSO 3 -(NH 4 ) 2 S 2 O 8 for DMAPAA (DMAPAA-grafted PAN) (9)(10)(11). For amphoteric-charged PAN membranes, graft polymerization was performed by a radical reaction in an aqueous solution containing both AAc and DMAPAA monomers, where the feed monomer ratio of AAc to DMAPAA was 60/40.…”
Section: Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of curve fitting, the ratio of positive charge concentration and negative charge concentration was also determined to be 0.34/0.66 (=0.52). This ratio did not deviate much from the value of 0.40/0.60 (=0.67) by Jimbo et al which was determined by ζ -potential measurement (8)(9)(10)(11).…”
Section: Comparison With Theoretical Predictions and Introduction Of mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The following values were used for the calculation. K P and K N are 6.4 and 4.2, respectively, which were given by Jimbo et al (8)(9)(10)(11) …”
Section: Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation