2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.04.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of supervised and unsupervised approaches for mudstone lithofacies classification: Case studies from the Bakken and Mahantango-Marcellus Shale, USA

Abstract: Quantitative lithofacies modeling is important to understand the depositional and diagenetic history, and hydrocarbon potential of unconventional resources at a regional scale. The complex heterogeneous nature and large data dimensionality of unconventional mudstone reservoirs increase the challenge of lithofacies interpretation by conventional qualitative methods. Quantitative shale lithofacies, which are meaningful, mappable, and predictable at core, well log, and regional scales, can be defined based on min… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following step, we performed our comparative study by applying SVM classifier as a class-membership predictive model. In this paper, the RBF kernel has been adopted in SVM implementation which is performing quite well in comparison to other kernels (Bhattacharya et al, 2016;Camps-Valls and Bruzzone, 2009;Hsu et al, 2003). The other important parameters for the SVM classifier include the coefficient of RBF kernel γ and σ 2 .…”
Section: Prediction Of Source Rock Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the following step, we performed our comparative study by applying SVM classifier as a class-membership predictive model. In this paper, the RBF kernel has been adopted in SVM implementation which is performing quite well in comparison to other kernels (Bhattacharya et al, 2016;Camps-Valls and Bruzzone, 2009;Hsu et al, 2003). The other important parameters for the SVM classifier include the coefficient of RBF kernel γ and σ 2 .…”
Section: Prediction Of Source Rock Zonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventionally, qualitative analysis is performed to recognize subsurface mudstone facies using core analysis, geomechanical spectroscopy logs, Rock-Eval pyrolysis, etc. (Bhattacharya et al 2016). The conventional methodology is found to be inconvenient, tiresome, expensive in nature and requires high domain expertise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognition of subsurface lithofacies is much researched topic and still a thought-provoking problem due to the uncertainty associated with reservoir measurements (Chaki et al 2015;Bhattacharya et al 2016). Quantitative modeling of lithofacies is essential to assess the potential of unconventional hydrocarbon reservoirs lying in mudstone formations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As redes neurais artificiais (RNA's) são ferramentas capazes de capturar estas relações entre os atributos inclusive relações não lineares(HAGAN et al, 2002). As comparações entre a aplicação das RNA's supervisionadas e não supervisionadas nas geociências mostram que a escolha é dependente da análise em cada caso, não existe uma regra a ser aplicada a todos os casos (BHATTACHARYA; CARR;PAL, 2016;SAYAGO et al, 2012). No caso específico deste trabalho, optamos por utilizar a técnica SOM.…”
unclassified