17th Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 1976
DOI: 10.2514/6.1976-1560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Supercritical and Conventional Wing Flutter Characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 19 and 20 show flutter speed and corresponding frequency with respect to time before landing. Flutter speed, which gradually decreases in time, takes a dip around transonic Mach numbers, a phenomenon similar to that observed for advanced transport aircraft [28,29]. Also, a variation in x α has effects mostly near the transonic regime, showing that the vehicle is less stable when the mass center is closer to the pitching axis.…”
Section: B Demonstration For Next-generation Hypersonic Transportsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Figures 19 and 20 show flutter speed and corresponding frequency with respect to time before landing. Flutter speed, which gradually decreases in time, takes a dip around transonic Mach numbers, a phenomenon similar to that observed for advanced transport aircraft [28,29]. Also, a variation in x α has effects mostly near the transonic regime, showing that the vehicle is less stable when the mass center is closer to the pitching axis.…”
Section: B Demonstration For Next-generation Hypersonic Transportsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…When a wing in transonic flow deforms, shocks move over the surface of the wing [3], which leads to complex aeroelasticity phenomena. An example of such intricate transonic flutter behavior is the transonic dip, which has been observed and described in detail by many researchers [4][5][6]. It is also commonly accepted that linear flutter theories cannot capture this transonic dip behavior accurately [7][8][9].…”
Section: N -mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Another interesting phenomenon that occurs in transonic flows is the transonic dip in the flutter boundary. [5][6][7][8] Linear theories cannot predict the location or shape of the transonic dip, and tend to produce optimistic estimates for the flutter boundary. 9 The seminal work by Theodorsen 10 is widely used for incompressible flutter predictions for two-dimensional airfoils.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%