2014
DOI: 10.1002/mrc.4052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of 1H–19F two‐dimensional NMR scalar coupling correlation pulse sequences

Abstract: The effectiveness of hetero-COSY, HETCOR, HMQC, and HSQC two-dimensional NMR pulse sequences for detection of (19)F-(1)H correlations by scalar coupling was evaluated on monofluorinated and polyfluorinated test compounds. All four of these sequences were effective in observing (1)H-(19)F correlations, using either (19) F or (1)H as the observe nucleus. All four sequences were amenable, to some degree, to adjustment to observe larger or smaller couplings preferentially. A 1/2J echo filter was effectively applie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this task a choice of three types of experiment exist: hetero-COSY, HETCOR or HMBC. 31,32 Most of these can be implemented using 19 F or 1 H as the directly detected nucleus. Using 19 F as the directly detected nucleus, the 2D 1 H, 19 F HMBC has the highest sensitivity, but yields mixed-phased multiplets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this task a choice of three types of experiment exist: hetero-COSY, HETCOR or HMBC. 31,32 Most of these can be implemented using 19 F or 1 H as the directly detected nucleus. Using 19 F as the directly detected nucleus, the 2D 1 H, 19 F HMBC has the highest sensitivity, but yields mixed-phased multiplets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear, however, that there are additional conformations present in oP 6 F 3 that cannot be easily quantified using the 1D 1 H NMR spectrum because of signal overlap.The 19 F{ 1 H} NMR spectra of both hexamers, shown in Figure3b, are, of course, much simpler than the 1 H NMR spectra. Using the 1 H assignments, the major signals could be unambiguously identified by the 1 H-19 F hetero-COSY spectra in Figure4a 47,48. Both 19 F{ 1 H} NMR spectra also show sets of smaller signals, which were confirmed to be from minor conformers by the 19 F-19 F EXSY spectra in Figure4b 49.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The chemical shift correlation experiments involving 19 F have evolved together with general improvements of liquidstate NMR methodology; 75 most notably the use of adiabatic 19 F inversion pulses is now widespread. 66,[76][77][78] Nevertheless, even some more resent 19 F experiments yield magnitude mode spectra, 76,78 provide correlation but not the values of coupling constants, 76 or contain refocusing periods that generally decrease their sensitivity. 77,78 Some phase sensitive experiments yield complicated cross peak structures, thereby lowering their sensitivity.…”
Section: F-centered Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…66,[76][77][78] Nevertheless, even some more resent 19 F experiments yield magnitude mode spectra, 76,78 provide correlation but not the values of coupling constants, 76 or contain refocusing periods that generally decrease their sensitivity. 77,78 Some phase sensitive experiments yield complicated cross peak structures, thereby lowering their sensitivity. [79][80][81] The new NMR experiments presented here build on these advances, are phase sensitive and produce cross peaks with a simple pattern that allow identification of active coupling constants.…”
Section: F-centered Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%