2012
DOI: 10.1017/s002221511200076x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of subjective olfaction ratings in patients with and without olfactory disorders

Abstract: Self-assessment of olfaction is only a reliable indicator in smell-impaired patients, not in healthy controls. For an accurate assessment of olfaction, reliable, standardised tests are needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
36
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several objective tests of olfactory function, including the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), which is one of the most widely utilized methods for assessing olfactory function in both clinical and research settings . It is important that a validated test be used to measure olfactory function as self‐assessment of olfaction has been shown to be unreliable …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…There are several objective tests of olfactory function, including the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), which is one of the most widely utilized methods for assessing olfactory function in both clinical and research settings . It is important that a validated test be used to measure olfactory function as self‐assessment of olfaction has been shown to be unreliable …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Interestingly, self-judgement of taste was significantly associated with energy intake, but self-judgement of smell was not, while smell function is generally recognized as an important factor for food intake [24]. We must consider that humans are generally not well able to rate their own smell sensitivity [25]. Therefore, we cannot exclude that reduced smell function influences energy intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relying on self‐assessment tools in patients with CRS‐linked olfactory impairment (by only asking about improvement or using visual analogue scales) does not seem sufficient. Self‐assessment does not always correlate with the results of psychophysical tests …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%