2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of subcutaneous versus intranasal immunization of male koalas (Phascolarctos cinereus) for induction of mucosal and systemic immunity against Chlamydia pecorum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a report by Waugh et al. () has made preliminary observations on a mucosal vaccination route in koalas, it did not demonstrate a protective immune response.…”
Section: Resistance and Tolerance At Individual And Population Levelsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although a report by Waugh et al. () has made preliminary observations on a mucosal vaccination route in koalas, it did not demonstrate a protective immune response.…”
Section: Resistance and Tolerance At Individual And Population Levelsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A recent study by Stary et al (2015) highlights the difficulties involved in developing a vaccine for chlamydia; the authors argue earlier chlamydial vaccines for human and other animal use have been at best ineffective and worse sometimes harmful, because vaccines have been developed using: (1) wrong antigen, (2) wrong adjuvant, and (3) wrong mode of administration (nonmucosal). Although a report by Waugh et al (2015) has made preliminary observations on a mucosal vaccination route in koalas, it did not demonstrate a protective immune response.…”
Section: Vaccination or Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, C. pneumoniae has been identified as a zoonotic pathogen, and it can infect a wide range of host species, such as the koala, frogs, and reptiles (Roulis et al 2013; Waugh et al 2015). The mouse model is used extensively in the investigation of a possible causal link between respiratory Chlamydia pneumoniae infection and asthma, COPD, and atherosclerosis and for the evaluation of immunopathogenic mechanisms (Campbell et al 2005a; Campbell and Kuo 1999; Chen et al 2010a; Zafiratos et al 2015).…”
Section: Animal Models Of Chlamydial Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mouse model is used extensively in the investigation of a possible causal link between respiratory Chlamydia pneumoniae infection and asthma, COPD, and atherosclerosis and for the evaluation of immunopathogenic mechanisms (Campbell et al 2005a; Campbell and Kuo 1999; Chen et al 2010a; Zafiratos et al 2015). It also has been used to screen vaccine candidates (Waugh et al 2015). …”
Section: Animal Models Of Chlamydial Pathogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%