2020
DOI: 10.26858/est.v6i2.12057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Students’ Attitudes in Science Subjects In Urban And Rural Areas

Abstract: This study aims to determine differences in attitudes held by students who are in rural and urban areas. Because attitude is the most important thing in 21st century education. The methodology in this study uses quantitative research with a survey design that uses a total sample of 2815 students based on total sampling collection techniques. In this study, using the ANOVA test with Poshoc further tests to determine differences in attitudes held by students. The results of this study found differences in attitu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in the former scale may be due to increased exposure of urban students to ‘real-life’ scientists, resulting in their slightly increased perception of scientists as ‘normal’ people. The reason for the difference in the latter scale remains unclear, although Astalini et al ( 2020 ) also found slightly higher attitudes toward science amongst students from rural areas compared to those from urban areas. The authors suggested that students who live in rural areas could be involved in more hands-on experimental-type activities in their daily lives, leading to increased adoption of scientific attitudes and concepts such as inquiry-driven investigations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The difference in the former scale may be due to increased exposure of urban students to ‘real-life’ scientists, resulting in their slightly increased perception of scientists as ‘normal’ people. The reason for the difference in the latter scale remains unclear, although Astalini et al ( 2020 ) also found slightly higher attitudes toward science amongst students from rural areas compared to those from urban areas. The authors suggested that students who live in rural areas could be involved in more hands-on experimental-type activities in their daily lives, leading to increased adoption of scientific attitudes and concepts such as inquiry-driven investigations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This was most notable for scale N (normality of scientists), where the items were spread across three different factors. Normality of scientists can be described as the manifestation of favourable attitudes toward scientists (Fraser, 1981 ), or perceiving scientists as people who look ordinary but can think scientifically and solve science-related problems (Astalini et al, 2020 ). Overall, these results concurred with Schibeci and McGaw ( 1981 ), who demonstrated that the factor structure of the TOSRA instrument was not evident in students’ response patterns, but it was supported by the conceptual framework of teachers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lastly, it can be concluded that the research that has been done, the young gifted students both in rural and urban elementary schools have varied learning styles, although there are differences between urban and rural schools. This can be caused by the environment in urban areas which is more comprehensive than the environment in rural areas (Astalini, Kurniawan, Darmaji & Anggraini, 2020). In addition, the results of motivation from both urban and rural areas also found differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…But in reality, what makes it interesting is the regional disparity because it is possible to have unique findings. Schools in rural areas tend to have different facilities, teachers, and environments from urban areas (Sun et al, 2019;Astalini et al, 2020). Differences in conditions and environment can affect learning activities (Barrett, et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%