2012
DOI: 10.1115/1.4007094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Strain-Gage and Fiber-Optic Goniometry for Measuring Knee Kinematics During Activities of Daily Living and Exercise

Abstract: There is increasing interest in wearable sensor technology as a tool for rehabilitation applications in community or home environments. Recent studies have focused on evaluating inertial based sensing (accelerometers, gyroscopes, etc.) that provide only indirect measures of joint motion. Measurement of joint kinematics using flexible goniometry is more direct, and still popular in laboratory environments, but has received little attention as a potential tool for wearable systems. The aim of this study was to c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of these effects was not found to affect the accuracy of the current analysis, and additional work characterizing these important sensor properties is currently underway. The impact of these errors is similar to previous IMUs [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ] and high deflection strain gauges [ 54 , 66 , 67 ] used to measure joint angles. By including the derivatives of the sensor outputs in the model, the average improvement of the RMSE in the flexion/extension and internal/external rotation degrees of freedom were −16.9% and −9.3%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The magnitude of these effects was not found to affect the accuracy of the current analysis, and additional work characterizing these important sensor properties is currently underway. The impact of these errors is similar to previous IMUs [ 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ] and high deflection strain gauges [ 54 , 66 , 67 ] used to measure joint angles. By including the derivatives of the sensor outputs in the model, the average improvement of the RMSE in the flexion/extension and internal/external rotation degrees of freedom were −16.9% and −9.3%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This resulted in a sample of eight participants (age 25 ± 5 years, mass 66 ± 12 kg, height 164 ± 8 cm, six females). The DKB test protocol is detailed elsewhere (Mohamed et al, 2012). Briefly, participants stood with each foot on side-by-side force plates and completed the DKB task three times.…”
Section: Motion Analysis Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By aligning the rotation axis of the goniometer with the corresponding biological joint, the sensor output directly reflects the joint displacement (i.e., no complex data processing needed). The most commonly used type of goniometer is the traditional rotary potentiometer, and magnetic encoders and fiber-optical sensors can also serve as the goniometers for joint measurement purposes [14][15][16]. Note that, when portable goniometers are used, these devices can be used for mobile gait measurement without being limited to the lab environments, facilitating the gait data collection in people's real-world daily-living scenarios.…”
Section: Prior Work On Gait Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%