2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00429-013-0630-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of (stereotactic) parcellations in mouse prefrontal cortex

Abstract: This study compares the cytoarchitectonic parcellation of the prefrontal cortex (PFC) in the mouse as presented in publications that are commonly used for identifying brain areas. Agreement was found to be greater for boundaries in the medial PFC than in the lateral PFC and lowest for those in the orbital areas of the PFC. In this review, we explain and illustrate in a selected series of photographs and stereotactic pictures the differences in location and terminology of the different prefrontal cortical areas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As with our first study, visible NR1 deletions were detected within the rostrocaudal extent of the mPFC corresponding to ~1.9 to 2.6 mm anterior to bregma, with predominant involvement of the AC/PL subregions (Paxinos, 2001; Van De Werd and Uylings, 2014), and a rostrocaudal area of hippocampus corresponding to ~1.7 to 2.5 mm posterior to bregma, with predominant involvement of the dorsal CA3 subregion (Paxinos, 2001). Only social interaction data from mice with bilateral mPFC or CA3 NR1-deletions were included in the final results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As with our first study, visible NR1 deletions were detected within the rostrocaudal extent of the mPFC corresponding to ~1.9 to 2.6 mm anterior to bregma, with predominant involvement of the AC/PL subregions (Paxinos, 2001; Van De Werd and Uylings, 2014), and a rostrocaudal area of hippocampus corresponding to ~1.7 to 2.5 mm posterior to bregma, with predominant involvement of the dorsal CA3 subregion (Paxinos, 2001). Only social interaction data from mice with bilateral mPFC or CA3 NR1-deletions were included in the final results.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…mPFC NR1-deletions were readily visualized spanning a rostrocaudal area corresponding to ~1.9-2.6 mm anterior to bregma, involving predominantly the AC/PL subregions of the mPFC (Paxinos, 2001; Van De Werd and Uylings, 2014). Hippocampal NR1-deletions spanned a rostrocaudal area corresponding to ~1.7-2.5 mm posterior to bregma, involving predominantly the dorsal CA3 subregion of the hippocampus (Paxinos, 2001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a neocortical structure, the mPFC is organized into six layers (I -VI) containing a majority of excitatory pyramidal neurons and a diverse array of inhibitory interneurons 99 . The mPFC can be parsed into distinct subregions based upon their cytoarchitecture, which are consistent with divergent functions among these regions 100 . The primary subdivisions of the mPFC in rodents include the prelimbic (PL) and infralimbic (IL) cortices.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Threat: Regulation Of Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…There have been lots of efforts to resolve conflicts/confusions regarding regionalization in the rodent PFC (Van De Werd and Uylings, 2014; Vogt and Paxinos, 2014; Watson et al, 2011). The rodent PFC is located over the medial, orbital, and insular surfaces of the rostral cerebral hemispheres and consists of two major frontal areas with which the MD nuclei have connections.…”
Section: Neurobiological Framework For Cognitive Function: Pfcmentioning
confidence: 99%