2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-015-3546-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of stem taper models for the four tropical tree species in Mount Makiling, Philippines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the models with different kernels, the supportFor each model, we first randomly selected 70% of the data for training and 30% for validation/testing (see also Bayat et al 2019a;Benali et al 2019). Common criteria for assessing the goodness-of-fit of model predictions have historically been the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), the root-mean-squared error (RMSE), the relative RMSE, BIAS, and the relative BIAS (Lumbres et al 2016). An important advantage of the relative RMSE (in %) is that it enables comparisons among predictions produced by different models (Pulido-Calvo et al 2007).…”
Section: Study Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the models with different kernels, the supportFor each model, we first randomly selected 70% of the data for training and 30% for validation/testing (see also Bayat et al 2019a;Benali et al 2019). Common criteria for assessing the goodness-of-fit of model predictions have historically been the coefficient of determination (R 2 ), the root-mean-squared error (RMSE), the relative RMSE, BIAS, and the relative BIAS (Lumbres et al 2016). An important advantage of the relative RMSE (in %) is that it enables comparisons among predictions produced by different models (Pulido-Calvo et al 2007).…”
Section: Study Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ample material is available on manifold functions and procedures for the precise estimation of diameter at any position along the trunk (Crecente-Campo et al 2009;Heidarsson and Pukkala 2011;Hjelm 2013;Özcelik and Göceri 2015;Lumbres et al 2016;Tang et al 2017). In this study, three stem taper functions from two groups, segmented and variable exponent, were fitted to estimate stem diameters of white birch with the best possible accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In modelling the stem taper of Betula pubescens in north-west Spain, the function received recommendations [25]; it also became the option of choice for Quercus glauca in South Korea [50]. It was recommended for modelling stem taper of several tropical species in the area of the Philippines [51], as well as for estimating stem diameter of Tectona grandis in mid-western Brazil [52]. The range of species for which the Kozak function has been recommended, as well as the number of regions for which it has been used, both make it possible to deduce that the taper function is a species-specific function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%