1997
DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199710000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Statistical Indicators for the Automatic Detection of 80 Hz Auditory Steady State Responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
8

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
51
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…With the present technique we can minimize testing time without any appreciable loss of accuracy [John et al, 2001;Perez-Abalo et al, 2001]. Also, different statistical methods can be used to eliminate the bias introduced by human expertise in the interpretation of the results [Picton et al, 1987;Stapells et al, 1988;Dobie and Wilson, 1989;Valdes et al, 1997]. Moreover stimulus and recording parameters can be further optimized to make the technique more efficient [John et al, 1998;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…With the present technique we can minimize testing time without any appreciable loss of accuracy [John et al, 2001;Perez-Abalo et al, 2001]. Also, different statistical methods can be used to eliminate the bias introduced by human expertise in the interpretation of the results [Picton et al, 1987;Stapells et al, 1988;Dobie and Wilson, 1989;Valdes et al, 1997]. Moreover stimulus and recording parameters can be further optimized to make the technique more efficient [John et al, 1998;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This statistic introduced by Valdes et al [1997] evaluates differences between two estimated mean values (signal vs. noise) using a maximum likelihood ratio approach. The noise variability is estimated using 60 spectral components at each side to the signal.…”
Section: Recording Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…100 Hz in Fig. 2) with the average power in the 16 FFT bins adjacent to the modulation rate of the stimulus (Cone-Wesson et al, 2002;Dobie and Wilson, 1996;Gorga et al, 2004;Hall, 2007;Herdman and Stapells, 2001;Korczak et al, 2012;Picton et al, 2003;Purcell et al, 2004;Valdes et al, 1997;van der Reijden et al, 2005). Bins were approximately 3 Hz in width, so the background noise was estimated for a range of about 48 Hz surrounding the modulation rate of the stimulus.…”
Section: Auditory Steady-state Responses (Assrs) To Modulated Tonesmentioning
confidence: 99%