2020
DOI: 10.3390/insects11080537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Static and Dynamic Assays When Quantifying Thermal Plasticity of Drosophilids

Abstract: Numerous assays are used to quantify thermal tolerance of arthropods including dynamic ramping and static knockdown assays. The dynamic assay measures a critical temperature while the animal is gradually heated, whereas the static assay measures the time to knockdown at a constant temperature. Previous studies indicate that heat tolerance measured by both assays can be reconciled using the time × temperature interaction from “thermal tolerance landscapes” (TTLs) in unhardened animals. To investigate if this re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We measured the tolerance of Rickettsiella (+) and Rickettsiella (−) aphids to high temperatures using static and dynamic heat knockdown assays ( 85 ). In each experiment, 7-d-old aphids were placed individually in 5 mL glass vials that were sealed with a plastic screw-top lid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured the tolerance of Rickettsiella (+) and Rickettsiella (−) aphids to high temperatures using static and dynamic heat knockdown assays ( 85 ). In each experiment, 7-d-old aphids were placed individually in 5 mL glass vials that were sealed with a plastic screw-top lid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture the impact of viral infection upon mosquito thermal limits, we assayed individuals in the thermal KD setup by using a static tolerance assay as compared to a dynamic assay, in which the insect is gradually exposed to ramping temperatures until thermal knockdown (KD) is achieved. However, whether these two physiological assays provide comparable measures for heat tolerance has been questioned [66]. The overall outcome for both assays is dependent on the duration of heat exposure and the temperature at which thermal stress occurs [50].…”
Section: Plos Neglected Tropical Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there seems to be little or no acclimation ability allowing an increase in their upper thermal limits (CT max ), supporting the contention that thermal tolerance shows less phenotypic plasticity at higher temperatures than at lower temperatures in invertebrates (Hoffmann et al, 2013). However, recent studies also suggest that the choice of assay may strongly affect conclusions drawn on the ecological role of thermal plasticity (Bak et al, 2020;MacLean et al, 2017;Sørensen et al, 2019). For example, for N. groenlandicus, thermal plasticity for heat tolerance was marked when using a static assay, but not when using a dynamic ramping assay (Box 2).…”
Section: Physiological Acclimation To High Temperaturementioning
confidence: 82%
“…Several studies have thus also focused on the intensity of heat stress and the exposure duration (Jørgensen et al, 2019;Rezende et al, 2014Rezende et al, , 2020. For example, static and dynamic assays give comparable information on heat tolerance across Drosophila species (Jørgensen et al, 2019), but static assays may prove superior to measure small differences in thermal tolerance (Bak et al, 2020).…”
Section: Box 1 Quantifying Heat Tolerance and Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation