2021
DOI: 10.1111/tid.13713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of standard versus low‐dose valganciclovir regimens for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high‐risk liver transplant recipients

Abstract: Purpose:The purpose of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of two valganciclovir (VGCV) institutional dosing protocols for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in liver transplant (LT) recipients with CMV serotype donor +/recipient-(D+/R−). Methods:This was a single-center review of CMV D+/R− adult LT recipients who received VGCV 450 mg/day for 90 days (low-dose) or VGCV 900 mg/day for 180 days (standard-dose). The primary outcome was incidence of CMV disease at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An additional study evaluated valganciclovir 450 mg daily versus 900 mg daily in high-risk LT patients who received triple immunosuppression. 17 The primary outcome, CMV disease, was not found to be statistically significant between the two groups, but 75% of CMV infections in the low-dose group had end-organ disease involvement. The study also found the standard-dose group had significantly more neutropenia than the lowdose group (10% vs. 60%, p < .001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An additional study evaluated valganciclovir 450 mg daily versus 900 mg daily in high-risk LT patients who received triple immunosuppression. 17 The primary outcome, CMV disease, was not found to be statistically significant between the two groups, but 75% of CMV infections in the low-dose group had end-organ disease involvement. The study also found the standard-dose group had significantly more neutropenia than the lowdose group (10% vs. 60%, p < .001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In this way, assessing the impact of this immunosuppression strategy on our CMV prophylaxis strategy was not possible. An additional study evaluated valganciclovir 450 mg daily versus 900 mg daily in high‐risk LT patients who received triple immunosuppression 17 . The primary outcome, CMV disease, was not found to be statistically significant between the two groups, but 75% of CMV infections in the low‐dose group had end‐organ disease involvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies concluded the low or reduced dosing regimen appeared as beneficial and safer than the full dosing regimen 18,21,22 . Neutropenia and leukopenia are two common adverse effects of valganciclovir, making appropriate endpoints to evaluate medication safety.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that 60% of patients receiving a dosage of 900 mg of valganciclovir experienced leukopenia of grade 3 or higher, and 20% of patients required administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. 23 To address this challenge, we aimed to identify ganciclovir trough concentrations that predict hematological toxicity and factors that may influence ganciclovir serum concentrations in lung transplant patients receiving valganciclovir prophylaxis. Our results indicated that a trough ganciclovir concentration of 872.0 ng/mL or higher was significantly associated with the development of severe leukopenia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Valganciclovir is the first‐line drug used for the prevention of CMV infection 4 ; however, its use is associated with a relatively high risk of hematologic toxicity, which can lead to treatment discontinuation. It was reported that 60% of patients receiving a dosage of 900 mg of valganciclovir experienced leukopenia of grade 3 or higher, and 20% of patients required administration of granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor 23 . To address this challenge, we aimed to identify ganciclovir trough concentrations that predict hematological toxicity and factors that may influence ganciclovir serum concentrations in lung transplant patients receiving valganciclovir prophylaxis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%