2015 IEEE Radar Conference 2015
DOI: 10.1109/radarconf.2015.7411913
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of square law, linear and bessel detectors for CA and OS CFAR algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that a square law detector demonstrates suitability in conditions with interference according to Melebari et al in [97], we postulate a square law detector with an attenuation of interference utilizing a simple Butterworth filter, achieving 2 • (−20 dB dec −1 ). In equation ( 9), X Attn signifies the desired level of interference attenuation, while N f represents the order of the Butterworth filter.…”
Section: Probability Of Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that a square law detector demonstrates suitability in conditions with interference according to Melebari et al in [97], we postulate a square law detector with an attenuation of interference utilizing a simple Butterworth filter, achieving 2 • (−20 dB dec −1 ). In equation ( 9), X Attn signifies the desired level of interference attenuation, while N f represents the order of the Butterworth filter.…”
Section: Probability Of Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…FA − 1) using statistical properties of the probability density functions associated to the range cells after square law is applied [13], and the probability density function of the test cell y. Complete details for deriving the equation are available in [14].…”
Section: Constant False Alarm Rate (Cfar) Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signal filtering and object extraction algorithms involve standard OS and CS CFAR implementations, each configured with two guarding cells and nc = 80 neighbor cells. For the OS-CFAR a scale factor of sc = 0.95 and an order k = 0.75 • nc are used [13,24]. The CA-CFAR is configured to use a dynamic scaling factor with a false-alarm probability P FA = 0.39 which yields a similar scaling probability, sc = 0.9528 (see Section 2.5.1).…”
Section: Software Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%