2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-016-1460-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of spectral density models to simulate wind records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned earlier, (21) has the advantage of simplicity, but incorporates two inconsistencies [11]: (1) the function is positive for any separation, which is in conflict with the definition of the longitudinal turbulence component with a zero mean; and (2) the function approaches unity for small frequencies, which is not true for separations of the same order of magnitude or even larger than the average size of gusts. To solve the two inconsistencies mentioned above, Krenk [13] suggested a modified exponential expression as the root-coherence function, which is given by…”
Section: Vertical Decay Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As mentioned earlier, (21) has the advantage of simplicity, but incorporates two inconsistencies [11]: (1) the function is positive for any separation, which is in conflict with the definition of the longitudinal turbulence component with a zero mean; and (2) the function approaches unity for small frequencies, which is not true for separations of the same order of magnitude or even larger than the average size of gusts. To solve the two inconsistencies mentioned above, Krenk [13] suggested a modified exponential expression as the root-coherence function, which is given by…”
Section: Vertical Decay Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where L c is a coherence scale parameter approximately equal to 340.2 m. For z o � 0.01 m, U(z r ) � 32 m/s, and U(z r ) � 55 m/s, Figure 2 shows a comparison among the three different models for the root-coherence function at three different points P 1 (0, 0, 10 m), P 2 (0, 0, 30 m), and P 3 (0, 0, 100 m); where different vertical decay constants ranging from 5 to 11.5 were used in the Davenport root-coherence function (21), whereas a vertical decay constant of 5 was used in the Krenk root-coherence function (22).…”
Section: Vertical Decay Constantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second expression is the von Karman-Harris expression for the frequency spectrum of the longitudinal component of wind velocity (parallel to the mean wind direction) [71,72], Table 6. In the formula, s 2 u is the variance of the turbulent wind speed, " UðzÞ is the mean wind speed at height z, L u is a length scale that characterizes the turbulent wind.…”
Section: Non-stationary Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic analysis of structures is complex and it requires real wind speed records, which are not available in most of the cases. Several studies suggest that the use of spectral density models are adequate to simulate the velocity field of the turbulent wind [1][2][3]. Due to the complexity of obtaining synthetic wind records and the dynamic structural response, the engineers have used non-complex methods such as the equivalent static analysis, which tries to consider the dynamic effects of the turbulent wind supported by the use of the well-known dynamic amplification factor [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%