Comparison of Specific Gravity and Creatinine for Normalizing Urinary Reproductive Hormone Concentrations

Abstract

Background: Specific gravity (SG) may perform as well as creatinine (CR) correction for adjusting urinary hormone concentrations, as well as offer some advantages. We compared the two methods and applied them to US and Bangladeshi specimens to evaluate their use in different populations. Methods: Pearson correlations between serum concentrations and SG, CR, and uncorrected urinary concentrations were compared using paired daily urine and serum specimens from one menstrual cycle from 30 US women. Corrected urinary estrone conjugate and pregnanediol glucuronide concentrations were compared with serum estradiol and progesterone. Urine specimens across one menstrual cycle from 13 Bangladeshi women were used to evaluate the applicability of both methods to a nonindustrialized population. Linear mixed-effects models were used to compare CR and SG values in the Bangladeshi vs US specimens. Results: There was no significant difference between SG-corrected vs serum and CR-corrected vs serum correlations for either assay. Usable CR results were obtained for all US specimens, but 37% of the Bangladeshi specimens were below the CR assay limit of detection. The Bangladeshi sample had significantly lower CR and higher inter-and intrasubject CR variability than the US sample. Conclusions: SG is a potentially useful alternative to CR correction for normalizing urinary steroid hormone

Biomarkers of selenium status in the amazonian context: Blood, urine and sequential hair segments

“…Spot-urine Se results were then adjusted for specific urine gravity (SG) to the overall average gravity of the study population of 1.018 g/ml (Spot-urine Se*(1.018À1)/ (SGÀ1)). This method was preferred to creatinine adjustment, as it is less sensitive to age, gender, body size and nutritional status (Miller et al, 2004;Suwazono et al, 2005). Fifteen individuals (12%) had urine gravity under 1.010 g/ml, which is considered low, but as no individual presented highly diluted urine samples (p1.001 g/ml), no one was excluded (Vahter et al, 2006).…”

Urinary beta-luteinizing hormone and beta-follicle stimulating hormone immunoenzymometric assays for population research

“…Urinary hormone values were adjusted by specimen specific gravity (17). Specific gravity measurements were taken with a hand-held urine specific gravity refractometer (Atago Uricon-PN, NSA Precision Cells, Inc).…”

The role of human biological monitoring in health risk assessment

“…Several studies have shown that the specific gravity-adjustment method for correcting urine dilution introduced less variability to datasets when compared to the creatinine-adjustment method (Ikeda et al, 2003;Miller et al, 2004;Pearson et al, 2009). The main assumption in specific gravity-adjustment is that changes in urinary flow rate do not affect the relative ratio between the mass of the xenobiotic and the mass of the total dissolved solids (SG) in a urinary spot sample (Pearson et al, 2009).…”