2021
DOI: 10.1002/jaba.830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of sounds and words as sample stimuli for discrimination training

Abstract: A portion of children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have difficulty acquiring conditional discrimination. However, previous researchers suggested that the discrimination of nonverbal auditory stimuli may be acquired more efficiently (Eikeseth & Hayward, 2009;Uwer, et al., 2002). For example, a child may learn to touch a picture of a piano after hearing the musical instrument more quickly than when the auditory stimulus is the spoken word "piano."The purpose of the present study was to extend pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, arranging sets with little stimulus disparity (i.e., the similar condition) produced slower acquisition and eventual mastery for Jill and Nico, who were most at risk for reading difficulties and who required the most sessions to mastery for both intervention sets. For Jill and Nico, this finding is consistent with prior research on stimulus disparity demonstrating that discrimination training is generally less efficient when comparison stimuli are more similar (Halbur, Caldwell, & Kodak, 2021; Halbur, Kodak et al, 2021). Interestingly, the discrepancy primarily occurred in teaching the first three‐word set.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, arranging sets with little stimulus disparity (i.e., the similar condition) produced slower acquisition and eventual mastery for Jill and Nico, who were most at risk for reading difficulties and who required the most sessions to mastery for both intervention sets. For Jill and Nico, this finding is consistent with prior research on stimulus disparity demonstrating that discrimination training is generally less efficient when comparison stimuli are more similar (Halbur, Caldwell, & Kodak, 2021; Halbur, Kodak et al, 2021). Interestingly, the discrepancy primarily occurred in teaching the first three‐word set.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This stimulus assignment error should be corrected in replications. Future studies could use an approach similar to Halbur et al (2021) to assign auditory stimuli across sets to maximize stimulus disparity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, researchers may consider evaluating the effects of different stimulus features (i.e., visual, auditory, and tactile) that result in the acquisition of matching skills. Recent studies evaluating the effects of visual and auditory antecedent manipulations demonstrate improved responding for other verbal behavior skills, such as motor imitation and auditory-visual conditional discrimination (Deshais & Vollmer, 2020; Halbur et al, 2021). Finally, researchers should extend the use of tactile prompting to other skill acquisition programs for children who may exhibit difficulty with attending to or tolerating response prompts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%