5th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit 1999
DOI: 10.2514/6.1999-1892
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of sound radiated by shallow cavities and backward facing steps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulations show a disturbance convection speed of 0.25 U for the wake mode and comparisons of the tones produced with those predicted by Rossiter's equation (K = 0. 25) give good agreement. The article includes pressure contours away from the cavity.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulations show a disturbance convection speed of 0.25 U for the wake mode and comparisons of the tones produced with those predicted by Rossiter's equation (K = 0. 25) give good agreement. The article includes pressure contours away from the cavity.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Jacob et al 25 A shallow cavity, L/D = 11, subject to low-speed flow was investigated in order to better understand the sound generated by the TGV's pantograph casing. Near-field and far-field acoustic measurements were made.…”
Section: Low Mach Number Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the inter-coach gap, the pantograph recess has a large length-to depth ratio, and behaves aerodynamically as a 'closed' cavity, which corresponds to a typical ratio of L/D > 13. The shear layer developed from the incoming boundary layer separates at the cavity leading edge, and impinges on to the floor of the cavity [117,118], separating again before it reaches the trailing edge wall. The aerodynamic behaviour of closed cavities is similar to the flow over a pair of backward and forward facing steps, and is characterised by flow separation, and the wake developed in the separated regions.…”
Section: Pantograph Recessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…microphones located R 0 D 2:50 § 0:01 m away from a point C located 0.22 m downstream of the step (because the experiment is designed for a comparison with other ow con gurations 15 ). Their angle µ 0 with the downstream x direction varies from 30 to 150 § 2 deg (every 15 deg).…”
Section: Acoustic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%