2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01324-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of sonic and ultrasonic phacoemulsification using the Staar Sonic Wave system

Abstract: Sonic technology yielded outcomes similar to those of ultrasonic phacoemulsification with respect to postoperative visual acuity and corneal edema in patients with average density nuclear sclerotic cataract.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent developments in phacoemulsification technology have led to benefits including decreased postocclusion surge and improved fluidics. Moreover, user-controlled parameters, such as interrupted phaco modes, vacuum settings, and variable aspiration flow rates, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] have increased the safety and predictability of the outcomes of cataract and refractive lens exchange procedures. Furthermore, increased surgeon confidence when using phacoemulsification techniques has led to experimentation with intentionally altered flow parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent developments in phacoemulsification technology have led to benefits including decreased postocclusion surge and improved fluidics. Moreover, user-controlled parameters, such as interrupted phaco modes, vacuum settings, and variable aspiration flow rates, [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] have increased the safety and predictability of the outcomes of cataract and refractive lens exchange procedures. Furthermore, increased surgeon confidence when using phacoemulsification techniques has led to experimentation with intentionally altered flow parameters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Associated benefits of improved technique is protection of the corneal endothelium against damage and less trauma to other intraocular tissues, which can cause complications such as posterior capsule rupture, uveal tissue trauma, and vitreous loss. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] In a previous observational study, we explored the intraoperative effect of using low or high fluidic parameters (eg, vacuum settings, bottle heights, and as- . We determined that IOP fluctuations and absolute IOP levels with lower fluidic parameters, specifically aspiration flow rate and bottle height, were lower than with higher fluidic parameters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, technological developments have led to advances in cataract surgery and many ways to reduce US energy have been achieved. Examples include nonultrasonic energy such as sonic frequencies, 11 NeoSoniX-generated tip rotation, 12,13 and pulse water-jet technology. 2 Restricting energy to fractions of second pulses or bursts 14,15 and millisecond-level microburst, 16 tip design, 17 and specific chopping technique [18][19][20][21][22][23] are favorable to lower energy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To protect the endothelium during cataract surgery, viscoelastic material maintains the anterior chamber depth, cushions the endothelium from the insertion of an IOL and acts as a barrier against the turbulent surgical environment (18)(19) . Other technologies and techniques have also improved cataract surgery, with reduction of the US energy produced (20)(21)(22)(23) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%