2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-8842(01)00056-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of some physico-chemical properties of hydrophilic and hydrophobic silica aerogels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slope of the curve, however, is different in the temperature ranges from 900 Figure 3 FTIR spectra of silica xerogel loaded by 5 mol% SnO 2 and sintered at different temperatures Figure 3 shows the Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) spectra of SX loaded by 5 mol% SnO 2 and sintered at different temperatures. For all samples, the absorption band (peak 1) observed at about 464 cm -1 was attributed to an Si-O-Si bending vibration (Wagh & Ingale, 2002). Peak 2, which appears at 634 cm −1 , relates to the O-Sn-O bridge functional groups of SnO 2 (Tan et al, 2011) which occur in samples sintered at temperatures greater than or equal to 900 o C. This confirms the presence of SnO 2 as a crystalline phase, and is in agreement with the results of the XRD analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The slope of the curve, however, is different in the temperature ranges from 900 Figure 3 FTIR spectra of silica xerogel loaded by 5 mol% SnO 2 and sintered at different temperatures Figure 3 shows the Fourier Transform Infra-Red (FTIR) spectra of SX loaded by 5 mol% SnO 2 and sintered at different temperatures. For all samples, the absorption band (peak 1) observed at about 464 cm -1 was attributed to an Si-O-Si bending vibration (Wagh & Ingale, 2002). Peak 2, which appears at 634 cm −1 , relates to the O-Sn-O bridge functional groups of SnO 2 (Tan et al, 2011) which occur in samples sintered at temperatures greater than or equal to 900 o C. This confirms the presence of SnO 2 as a crystalline phase, and is in agreement with the results of the XRD analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For all samples, bands at 802 cm -1 (peak 3) and 1099 cm -1 (peak 5) are assigned, respectively, to the symmetric stretching of the Si-O-Si group and to the asymmetric stretching of the Si-O-Si structural bond of siloxane (Jung et al, 2005). In an untreated sample, peak 4 at around 980 cm -1 corresponds to the presence of an Si-OH group (Wagh & Ingale, 2002). Peak 6, observed at 1620 cm -1 , is associated with bending H-O-H bond groups of adsorbed water molecules, while a broad band (peak 7) at 3452 cm -1 is attributed to O-H stretching from hydroxyl groups that are present on the surface of the material (Yang & Gao, 2006).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Figure 5a shows the FTIR spectra of silica xerogel with varying loading of TiO 2 sintered at 1200°C. For all samples, the absorption bands (peaks 1, 2, and 3) observed at about 464 cm −1 , 800 cm −1 , and 624 cm −1 were attributed to a Si-O-Si bending vibration, the symmetric stretching mode of the Si-O-Si bond, and the crystalline cristobalite phase, respectively (Wagh & Ingale, 2002;Yang & Gao, 2006). Additionally, for all samples, peak 4, at around 952 cm −1 , corresponds to the presence of Si-O-Ti vibration modes, due to the overlapping of the vibration of Si-OH and Si-O-Ti bonds (El-Toni et al, 2006;Balachandaran et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This type of aerogels have undergone a surface modification, which provides the hydrophobic character [32,41,43,54,61,63,68,69,72,74]. In particular, their contact angle with water droplet depends on the silylating agent (non-polar groups) [43,54,61,69].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, their contact angle with water droplet depends on the silylating agent (non-polar groups) [43,54,61,69]. The data regarding water absorption of such aerogels shows that the untreated aerogels (hydrophilic) absorb water by 4-5 times their own weight, while silylated aerogels (hydrophobic), absorb less than 2 % water with respect to their own weight [68]. Nevertheless, the high hydrophobicity of aerogels poses a processing problem when mixed with water based mineral binders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%