2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41379-021-00880-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of solid tissue sequencing and liquid biopsy accuracy in identification of clinically relevant gene mutations and rearrangements in lung adenocarcinomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagnostic tools for monitoring the molecular evolution through noninvasive techniques such as liquid biopsy are becoming accessible and will be a valuable tool for further improving personalized treatment in cancer. Especially, detection of molecular alterations utilizing ctDNA may be a viable approach for patients who do not have access to a tissue specimen or a high-quality biopsy ( 39 ). In a single-center analysis of 323 non–small cell lung cancer patients, 229 had concurrent plasma and tissue NGS or were unable to complete tissue testing.…”
Section: Clinical Utility Of Circulating Tumor Dna (Ctdna)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnostic tools for monitoring the molecular evolution through noninvasive techniques such as liquid biopsy are becoming accessible and will be a valuable tool for further improving personalized treatment in cancer. Especially, detection of molecular alterations utilizing ctDNA may be a viable approach for patients who do not have access to a tissue specimen or a high-quality biopsy ( 39 ). In a single-center analysis of 323 non–small cell lung cancer patients, 229 had concurrent plasma and tissue NGS or were unable to complete tissue testing.…”
Section: Clinical Utility Of Circulating Tumor Dna (Ctdna)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective trial by Lin et al showed that, in lung adenocarcinoma, tissue-based NGS had significantly higher sensitivity than plasma-based NGS (94.9% vs. 52.6%, although not all patients in this setting were treatment naïve) [ 20 ], whereas Liebs et al found a concordance between tumor tissue and cfDNA of 63%, 55% and 11% in colorectal cancer, melanoma and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [ 21 ]. Recently, Khatami, F. et al reported the importance of liquid biopsy in both diagnosis and prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liang et al showed that ctDNA detection via deep methylation sequencing paired with machine learning identified more patients with cancer compared to mutation sequencing analysis, highlighting detection of low tumor-derived signals ( Liang et al, 2021 ). However, in another study by Lin et al, solid tissue-NGS detection of clinically relevant genomic aberrations and therapeutic targets was more reliable than plasma-NGS ( Lin et al, 2021 ), thereby discouraging clinicians from making treatment decisions based on plasma-NGS alone. A previous limitation of high-throughput screening as a routine MRD diagnostic method in ALL is the tendency to amplify non-specific targets.…”
Section: Methods Of Circulating Tumor Dna Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%