2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2022.103644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of solid particle erosion predictions using the dense discrete phase and discrete element models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DDPM in Ansys Fluent ® further considers the particle volume fraction and particle-particle collision process described by the hard sphere model, but particle-particle collision forces are calculated by the kinetic theory of granular flow (KTGF). DEM can disclose the whole unsteady particle-particle collision process with the soft sphere model but needs massive computing resources [34]. The DEM is less used to simulate the erosion phenomenon in complex industrial pipes.…”
Section: Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DDPM in Ansys Fluent ® further considers the particle volume fraction and particle-particle collision process described by the hard sphere model, but particle-particle collision forces are calculated by the kinetic theory of granular flow (KTGF). DEM can disclose the whole unsteady particle-particle collision process with the soft sphere model but needs massive computing resources [34]. The DEM is less used to simulate the erosion phenomenon in complex industrial pipes.…”
Section: Tomentioning
confidence: 99%