1999
DOI: 10.1109/24.799900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of software-reliability-growth predictions: neural networks vs parametric-recalibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors considered only average error (AE), average bias (AB), normalized average error (NAE) for predictability measure, but not considered root mean square error (RMSE), normalized root mean square error(NRMSE). Sitte (1999), analyzed two models for software reliability prediction: 1) neural network models and 2) parametric recalibration models. The author used Kolmogorov distance as the common prediction measure in the comparison experiment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors considered only average error (AE), average bias (AB), normalized average error (NAE) for predictability measure, but not considered root mean square error (RMSE), normalized root mean square error(NRMSE). Sitte (1999), analyzed two models for software reliability prediction: 1) neural network models and 2) parametric recalibration models. The author used Kolmogorov distance as the common prediction measure in the comparison experiment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sitte [8] presented a neural network based method for software reliability prediction. He compared the approach with recalibration for parametric models using some meaningful predictive measures with same datasets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It made the model difficult to use, or lead to the prediction result is not satisfactory. With a detailed study, the neural network prediction method has a better effect than the traditional parametric model prediction [3]. It has good adaptability and can improve the prediction accuracy effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%