2004
DOI: 10.4184/jkss.2004.11.4.261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Smith-Petersen Osteotomy versus Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for the Correction of Fixed Sagittal Imbalance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

6
116
2
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
116
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In our series, the corrections of the segmental kyphotic angle were similar to those found in the study of Cho et al, 6 who compared patients submitted to three or more SPOs with those submitted to one PSO for sagittal imbalance. They found an angle of correction of segmental kyphosis of 33.0º ±9.2º and in the group subjected to SPO, this angle was 31.7º ±9.0º.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our series, the corrections of the segmental kyphotic angle were similar to those found in the study of Cho et al, 6 who compared patients submitted to three or more SPOs with those submitted to one PSO for sagittal imbalance. They found an angle of correction of segmental kyphosis of 33.0º ±9.2º and in the group subjected to SPO, this angle was 31.7º ±9.0º.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In VCR, the group of Suk et al 5 showed 17% neurological complications. A study by Cho et al 6 found 30 cases in patients subjected to more than 2 SPOs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a world where appearance and health become increasingly important for social acceptance and well-being, the inability to function at the level of one's peers due to pain or deformity can create a huge psychological burden. As the recognition, evaluation, and treatment of spinal deformity continues to progress, there are many emerging new methods for the treatment of kyphoscoliosis, including common VCR, SPO (SmithPetersen osteotomy), PSO (pedicle subtraction osteotomy), PVCR, and eggshell methods [5,8,28,33]. In general, for minor degree of imbalance and curve less than 70°and 50°i n coronal and sagittal planes, posterior soft tissue release with compression on the convex side should be sufficient to produce moderate correction and balance [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…87 percent of patients who had SPOs required anterior arthrodesis compared to 39 percent for patients with PSOs. 8 This is due to the fact that a PSO results in apposition of bone surfaces of the anterior and middle columns, unlike the SPO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SPOs average only 10.7 degrees of sagittal correction per segment while PSOs average 33 degrees of correction per segment. 8 Second, follow-up anterior stabilization is required less often with PSOs. 87 percent of patients who had SPOs required anterior arthrodesis compared to 39 percent for patients with PSOs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%