2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12663-015-0809-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Skin Staples and Standard Sutures for Closing Incisions After Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: A Double-Blind, Randomized and Prospective Study

Abstract: It was concluded that skin staples are better alternatives to conventional sutures in head and neck cancer surgery as they offer ten times faster wound closure, cost effectiveness, and similar results to sutures in terms of patient comfort, aesthetic outcome and complication rate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

9
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
9
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the authors had suggested local application of eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA) cream one hour prior to the removal of skin staples [ 17 ]. However, in the present study, there is no difference in pain perceived in both the groups after POD 1 and at the time of removal in accord with the findings of some studies [ 18 - 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…One of the authors had suggested local application of eutectic mixture of lidocaine and prilocaine (EMLA) cream one hour prior to the removal of skin staples [ 17 ]. However, in the present study, there is no difference in pain perceived in both the groups after POD 1 and at the time of removal in accord with the findings of some studies [ 18 - 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Because fibrin sealant biodegrades within 2 weeks, foreign bodies, such as sutures and staples, are not left in the wound, especially in the granulation bed. In addition, patients often report severe pain when staples are removed, and occasionally, an anesthetic procedure is required (O’Grady et al 2000; Batra et al 2016; Himel et al 1994; Best et al 1995; Ghosh et al 2015). Because fibrin sealant adheres to the entire surface, hematoma/seroma formation is significantly reduced compared with point-fixation sutures or staples (Cha et al 2012; Gibran et al 2007; Llanos et al 2006; Myer et al 2015; Mabrouk et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Interestingly, the most common reasons given for not using staples included patient discomfort, cost, and worse cosmetic outcomes, which are unsubstantiated with head and neck comparative studies. [2][3][4] Although cost was the least important variable for determining closure type in our surveyed cohort, it is likely that the overall cost of closure is frequently underestimated. A higher material cost is noted with staples; however, the largest determinant of overall cost remains the surgeon's time, which is reduced by factors of 10 or more when closing with staples.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A higher material cost is noted with staples; however, the largest determinant of overall cost remains the surgeon's time, which is reduced by factors of 10 or more when closing with staples. 2,3 This difference-coupled with the unchanged cosmetic outcome and complication rates-makes staples more advantageous for high-tension scalp wounds. 4 Moreover, the stapling technique is more reproducible than suturing, which requires more surgical skill and experience.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%