2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2012.02.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Skin Prick Tests with In Vitro Allergy Tests in the Characterization of Horses with Recurrent Airway Obstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(95 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have addressed the potential value of intradermal allergen testing in the diagnostic approach to RAO. Although some studies have demonstrated an increased frequency and/or magnitude of skin responses in RAO-susceptible horses, compared with control horses, following intradermal injections of stable dust, mould extracts and various allergens [177][178][179][180][181][182], conflicting results have been obtained from other studies that failed to reveal any differences between the groups [183,184]. Consequently, the diagnostic value of this approach remains questionable and significantly less sensitive in a clinical setting than the diagnostic methods described above.…”
Section: Immunological Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have addressed the potential value of intradermal allergen testing in the diagnostic approach to RAO. Although some studies have demonstrated an increased frequency and/or magnitude of skin responses in RAO-susceptible horses, compared with control horses, following intradermal injections of stable dust, mould extracts and various allergens [177][178][179][180][181][182], conflicting results have been obtained from other studies that failed to reveal any differences between the groups [183,184]. Consequently, the diagnostic value of this approach remains questionable and significantly less sensitive in a clinical setting than the diagnostic methods described above.…”
Section: Immunological Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since positivity is not specific for asthma but only identifies atopic status, confirmation of the clinical significance of the identified allergens in the pathogenesis of asthma should be pursued. To this aim, allergen avoidance is indicated [54] to observe the eventual remission of symptoms and prevention of exacerbations. However, avoidance strategies are not always feasible, since some aeroallergens are ubiquitous-in this case, the most accurate evaluation of the diagnostic value of IDT may be to compare these tests with the gold standard of induction of clinical disease by a provocative inhalation challenge using the identified allergens, which would provide more substantial evidence of their role as causative antigens [26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings demonstrate that sIgE to A. siro , D. pteronyssinus , D. farinae and T. putrescentiae based on MAST results is good predictor of mite allergy in horses (AUC ranges 0.803–0.969) but to L. destructor showed lack of diagnostic value (0.467). Comparisons of serological test results (sIgE in sera) and IDT were previously performed in horses, mainly in the course of recurrent airway obstruction, [1819], skin hypersensitivity [2021] and insect hypersensitivity [324]. Morgan et al [23] assessed horses with seasonal and perennial symptoms of skin hypersensitivity and urticaria, demonstrating low concordance between IgE and IDT, except for grass allergens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Positive reactions were also observed in healthy control animals. Tilley et al [21] showed the highest compatibility between serological tests and the prick test for mites ( D. farinae ) among all groups of allergens. Thus, the sensitivity, specificity and agreement of the different IgE tests varied according to the group of allergens, the type of allergic disease and even individual allergen belonging to the same antigenic group what our study supports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%