2001
DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2001.114931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of six pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass pumps during pulsatile and nonpulsatile perfusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to technical limitations and several damping components such as the oxygenator and arterial filter, the properties of pulsatile flow used in the clinical setting are far from the ones of physiological pulsatile flow [9,10]. The fundamental problem of comparing the different perfusion modes or different types of pulsatile flow is the lack of a clear definition or a precise quantification of pulsatility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to technical limitations and several damping components such as the oxygenator and arterial filter, the properties of pulsatile flow used in the clinical setting are far from the ones of physiological pulsatile flow [9,10]. The fundamental problem of comparing the different perfusion modes or different types of pulsatile flow is the lack of a clear definition or a precise quantification of pulsatility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 These results clearly suggest that pulsatile perfusion with a physiologic pulsatile pump generates significantly higher hemodynamic energy than a non-pulsatile roller pump. 4 This extra energy is transmitted in all directions, which improves red cell flow, plasma flow and lymphatic flow. 5 Several investigators have demonstrated that pulsatile flow reduces systemic vascular resistance and attenuates the catecholamine response 6 and hypothyroidism 7 and also improves splanchnic perfusion, 8 myocardial blood flow 9 and clinical outcome 6 -10 after cardiopulmonary bypass.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…3 Recently, a new approach for a comparative study between non-pulsatile and pulsatile support was suggested for precise quantification of pressure-flow waveforms. 1,2,4 Ündar et al documented that the difference between Shepard's energy equivalent pressure (EEP) formula and pre-cannula extracorporeal circuit pressure is 45% when using a physiologic pulsatile pump. 4 These results clearly suggest that pulsatile perfusion with a physiologic pulsatile pump generates significantly higher hemodynamic energy than a non-pulsatile roller pump.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flow pulsatility has been shown to be beneficial for organ perfusion [27] as well as healthy vascular gene expression and remodelling; however, the energetic cost of delivering a constant CO is higher in pulsatile flow than in non-pulsatile flow [26,72]. In the healthy circulatory system, the pulsatile component of ventricular load operates optimally and constitutes a small fraction of the total power requirement of the ventricle (approx.…”
Section: Non-dimensional Numbers In the Clinical Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%