2004
DOI: 10.1080/07060660409507149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of single-point alfalfa yield models based on visual disease intensity and remote sensing assessments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, this method proved to be noninvasive, nondestructive, and easier to perform compared with visual methods that require entering and damaging the pyrethrum canopy while attempting to follow a systematic sampling design to select and remove stems for visual assessment. Moreover, measurements of reflectance obtained from a handheld radiometer have been shown to be faster and easier to obtain than visual methods of assessment in several other pathosystems (18,24,32,34,35). In our study, we found radiometric assessment of plots to be approximately three times faster than visual disease assessments, without the need to physically remove stems for visual assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, this method proved to be noninvasive, nondestructive, and easier to perform compared with visual methods that require entering and damaging the pyrethrum canopy while attempting to follow a systematic sampling design to select and remove stems for visual assessment. Moreover, measurements of reflectance obtained from a handheld radiometer have been shown to be faster and easier to obtain than visual methods of assessment in several other pathosystems (18,24,32,34,35). In our study, we found radiometric assessment of plots to be approximately three times faster than visual disease assessments, without the need to physically remove stems for visual assessments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…However, radiometric methods do account for reductions in GLAI because there is a high correlation between percent reflectance values and GLAI. Plant growth has been demonstrated to be proportional to the amount of radiation intercepted by plant canopies, especially at crucial stages of plant development (13,17,18). Previous research on the temporal dynamics in foliar disease intensity and stem growth of the P. ligulicola-pyrethrum pathosystem indicate that August and September were the most likely critical infection period, with maximum disease intensity occurring around mid-October (36,38).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Improvements were apparent as both systematic and constant bias were reduced. regression to evaluate and compare the accuracy and precision of: (i) colour disease assessment protocols (e.g., use of a linear scale versus a logarithmic disease assessment scale) (Nutter and Esker, 2005), (ii) disease assessment instruments (e.g., image analysis or remote sensing sensors and instruments) (Nutter, 1990;Guan and Nutter, 2004), and/or (iii) disease raters, can provide researchers with statistical methods to determine the accuracy and precision of disease assessment data (Nutter et al, 1993;Nutter and Littrell, 1996;Nutter, 1997a;Guan and Nutter, 2003). Thus, researchers can and should place greater focus upon evaluating, comparing, and selecting the best disease assessment protocols, instruments, and/or raters that best meet the goals of the research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, assessments that will be used to quantify the relationship between disease intensity (X) and yield loss (Y) will require greater accuracy and precision than assessments used to determine the relative levels of cultivar resistance (low, moderate, high) in a plant breeding programme Guan and Nutter, 2004). In more advanced breeding lines, however, more accurate and precise information may be needed to quantify levels of rate-reducing resistance (Nutter and Gaunt, 1996;Nutter and Parker, 1997).…”
Section: Choosing a Scale Of Measurement And Types Of Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%