2015
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stv835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of simple mass estimators for slowly rotating elliptical galaxies

Abstract: We compare the performance of mass estimators for elliptical galaxies that rely on the directly observable surface brightness and velocity dispersion profiles, without invoking computationally expensive detailed modeling. These methods recover the mass at a specific radius where the mass estimate is expected to be least sensitive to the anisotropy of stellar orbits. One method (Wolf et al. 2010) uses the total luminosityweighted velocity dispersion and evaluates the mass at a 3D half-light radius r 1/2 , i.e.,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, real elliptical galaxies are never perfectly spherical, nor they have exactly M (r) ∝ r mass profile or constant anisotropy. Despite all these complications the above relation was shown to provide essentially unbiased masses of massive elliptical galaxies with the RMS scatter of ≃ 12% (see tests in Lyskova et al 2015).…”
Section: Description Of the Simple Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, real elliptical galaxies are never perfectly spherical, nor they have exactly M (r) ∝ r mass profile or constant anisotropy. Despite all these complications the above relation was shown to provide essentially unbiased masses of massive elliptical galaxies with the RMS scatter of ≃ 12% (see tests in Lyskova et al 2015).…”
Section: Description Of the Simple Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The half-light mass estimators that is based on have been verified to be robust in a wide range of systems and N-body simulations (Walker & Peñarrubia 2011;Kowalczyk et al 2013;Laporte, Walker & Peñarrubia 2013;Lyskova et al 2015;Campbell et al 2017;González-Samaniego et al 2017;Errani, Peñarrubia & Walker 2018). There has been a healthy discussion about the robustness of the estimator (Walker & Peñarrubia 2011;Kowalczyk et al 2013;Laporte et al 2013;Genina et al 2018).…”
Section: S I M P L E E S T I M Ato R S O F M a S S S L O P Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simple mass estimators have been tested on ideal spherically symmetric systems (Walker & Peñarrubia 2011), simulations of ideal dSphs in a static MW potential (Kowalczyk et al 2013), stellar distributions placed in subhaloes from dark matter only simulations (Laporte et al 2013a), and cosmological zoom simulations of isolated elliptical galaxies (Lyskova et al 2015). More recently, the first generation of simulations with enough resolution to model the satellite galaxies of the MW reliably, in a realistic cosmological setting, have become available (Grand et al 2016;Sawala et al 2016;Wetzel et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%