2006
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.80.10.4868-4877.2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus SIVagmVer Replication and CD4 + T-Cell Dynamics in Vervet and Sabaeus African Green Monkeys

Abstract: The simian immunodeficiency viruses (SIV) naturally infect a wide range of African primates, includingAfrican green monkeys (AGM). Despite moderate to high levels of plasma viremia in naturally infected AGM, infection is not associated with immunodeficiency. We recently reported that SIVagmVer90 isolated from a naturally infected vervet AGM induced AIDS following experimental inoculation of pigtailed macaques. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the replication of this isolate in two species of AGM, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, these two models of persistent nonprogressive infection have pathogenic counterparts employing the same viruses, as SIVsmm can be pathogenic in rhesus macaques (RMs) (29,54) and SIVagm is pathogenic in pigtailed macaques (12,17,22; D. Mandell et al, submitted for publication). While these studies of SMs and AGMs have provided a number of important data on the pathophysiology of natural SIV infections (2,4,8,16,18,19,36,38,39,43,56), it can be argued that an approach focusing only on these two models may skew our view of a phenomenon that involves more than 40 different nonhuman primate species. Indeed, differences between SIV infections in SMs and AGMs have even been observed, and species-specific mechanisms employed for controlling disease progression have been identified (1,4,33,67).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of note, these two models of persistent nonprogressive infection have pathogenic counterparts employing the same viruses, as SIVsmm can be pathogenic in rhesus macaques (RMs) (29,54) and SIVagm is pathogenic in pigtailed macaques (12,17,22; D. Mandell et al, submitted for publication). While these studies of SMs and AGMs have provided a number of important data on the pathophysiology of natural SIV infections (2,4,8,16,18,19,36,38,39,43,56), it can be argued that an approach focusing only on these two models may skew our view of a phenomenon that involves more than 40 different nonhuman primate species. Indeed, differences between SIV infections in SMs and AGMs have even been observed, and species-specific mechanisms employed for controlling disease progression have been identified (1,4,33,67).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to the hypothesis that virus replication mainly occurs in macrophages, there is some evidence against this: (i) the dynamics of virus replication during acute infection is strikingly similar between progressive and nonprogressive SIV infections (51), which likely would not be the case if replication were supported by long-lived infected cells that produce virus slowly; (ii) the massive acute depletion of mucosal CD4 ϩ T cells suggests that these cells are the SIV targets (19,48); moreover, although this massive mucosal CD4 ϩ T-cell depletion involves all the CD4 ϩ T-cell subsets, the effector memory CD4 ϩ T-cell pool is the most susceptible and shows only minor restoration during chronic infection (19,48), similar to pathogenic HIV-1 and SIV infections (38,56); (iii) we and others (15) have provided direct evidence by in situ hybridization that, during acute infection of AGMs, SIVagm replicates in lymphocytes and not in macrophages (Fig. 2) (47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to model the dynamics of virus replication, thorough sampling schedules during the primary SIVagm.sab infection and antiretroviral treatment were designed. Blood (4.9 ml, EDTA anticoagulated) was collected from the femoral vein at days Ϫ7 and 0, 3,6,8,10,13,15,18,20,28,30,42,56,72, 100, 132, 185 post-SIVagm.sab inoculation. Moreover, every 7 days between day 100 and day 132, 4.9 ml of blood was collected (with EDTA) to determine the weekly variation of VLs in SIVagm.sab-infected AGMs.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A real-time RT-PCR assay for quantitation of viral RNA in plasma was performed as previously described (19).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%