1999
DOI: 10.1116/1.590962
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of silicon stencil mask distortion measurements with finite element analysis

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inElectron projection lithography mask format layer stress measurement and simulation of pattern transfer distortion J.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 For the case of ECES fabricated Si membranes the thickness depends on the pn junction space-charge region. This can be explained as follows with the assumptions ͑i͒ that near the pn junction (xϭ0) in the thermal equilibrium the charge density is zero outside of the transition region (Ϫx p 0 ϽxϽx n 0 ) since bulk silicon is electrically neutral, ͑ii͒ that the minority electrons on the p side and the minority holes on the n side are neglected, and ͑iii͒ that the majority carrier concentrations are close to the doping concentrations near the edge of the transition region.…”
Section: Pn Junction Eces Techniques For Silicon Membrane Fabricamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 For the case of ECES fabricated Si membranes the thickness depends on the pn junction space-charge region. This can be explained as follows with the assumptions ͑i͒ that near the pn junction (xϭ0) in the thermal equilibrium the charge density is zero outside of the transition region (Ϫx p 0 ϽxϽx n 0 ) since bulk silicon is electrically neutral, ͑ii͒ that the minority electrons on the p side and the minority holes on the n side are neglected, and ͑iii͒ that the majority carrier concentrations are close to the doping concentrations near the edge of the transition region.…”
Section: Pn Junction Eces Techniques For Silicon Membrane Fabricamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the FE result and measurements have a 3y value of24 nm in the best case [6]. After applying a magnification correction, the deviation between FE calculations and experiment can be as small as 18 nm 3.…”
Section: Fe Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to predict process-induced distortions of the membrane, a Finite Element (FE) model has been developed simulating the wafer patterning and membrane fabrication process [6]. The model includes the orthotropic elastic properties of silicon as well as the initial warp of the wafer, the actual mask geometry and the initial membrane stress due to doping.…”
Section: Fe Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%