“…The main reasons for detachment between a denture base and denture teeth include the presence of wax on the ridge lap surface of an artificial tooth, an inattentive application of the separating agent, and the polymerization technique used for the fabrication of denture base resin [ 27 , 28 ]. Beside chemical and mechanical modifications of the ridge lap surface, prefabricated teeth with different composition (acrylic/composite) can be expected to have differences in bond strength values between teeth and resin [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, with developments in science and technology, new materials in removable prosthodontics have been disclosed [ 30 ]. Technological progress in dental medicine has enabled the usage of digital methods (computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing [CAD/CAM]), including subtractive and additive technologies for denture base manufacturing [ 29 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Digital methods allow the fabrication of a denture base in one piece and ensure the option to adhere artificial teeth with adequate adhesive [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, two fabrication methods are attainable when using the milling method: (a) production of a denture base and denture teeth from one portion, and (b) production of a denture base and denture teeth as segregate portions, requiring a bonding procedure [ 29 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. Currently, the second method is more popular for fabricating dentures [ 34 , 35 , 37 , 38 , 39 ], mainly due to better fitting and retention [ 36 , 38 , 40 ] and utilization of the commercially affordable denture teeth with enhanced physical and aesthetic properties [ 41 , 42 ].…”
The data about bond strength between digitally produced denture base resins and artificial teeth are scarce. Several studies investigated shear bond strength values of milled denture base resins and different types of artificial teeth. The purpose of the present study was to compare and evaluate the available evidence through a systematic review. A bibliographic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to assess adequate studies published up to 1 June 2022. This review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The appropriate studies that determined the shear bond strength values between milled denture base resins and artificial teeth were selected. The initial search identified 103 studies, which were included in the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews. Three studies met the inclusion criteria, and all of them present a moderate risk of bias (score 6). Two studies found no statistical differences between heat-polymerized and CAD/CAM (milled) denture base materials when attached with different types of artificial teeth, while one study showed higher values of CAD/CAM (milled) denture base materials. Bonding agents ensure bonding strength at least similar to the conventional methods. In order to improve the quality of future studies, it would be advantageous to use a larger number of specimens with standardized dimensions and a blinded testing machine operator to decrease the risk of bias.
“…The main reasons for detachment between a denture base and denture teeth include the presence of wax on the ridge lap surface of an artificial tooth, an inattentive application of the separating agent, and the polymerization technique used for the fabrication of denture base resin [ 27 , 28 ]. Beside chemical and mechanical modifications of the ridge lap surface, prefabricated teeth with different composition (acrylic/composite) can be expected to have differences in bond strength values between teeth and resin [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, with developments in science and technology, new materials in removable prosthodontics have been disclosed [ 30 ]. Technological progress in dental medicine has enabled the usage of digital methods (computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing [CAD/CAM]), including subtractive and additive technologies for denture base manufacturing [ 29 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Digital methods allow the fabrication of a denture base in one piece and ensure the option to adhere artificial teeth with adequate adhesive [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, two fabrication methods are attainable when using the milling method: (a) production of a denture base and denture teeth from one portion, and (b) production of a denture base and denture teeth as segregate portions, requiring a bonding procedure [ 29 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. Currently, the second method is more popular for fabricating dentures [ 34 , 35 , 37 , 38 , 39 ], mainly due to better fitting and retention [ 36 , 38 , 40 ] and utilization of the commercially affordable denture teeth with enhanced physical and aesthetic properties [ 41 , 42 ].…”
The data about bond strength between digitally produced denture base resins and artificial teeth are scarce. Several studies investigated shear bond strength values of milled denture base resins and different types of artificial teeth. The purpose of the present study was to compare and evaluate the available evidence through a systematic review. A bibliographic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to assess adequate studies published up to 1 June 2022. This review followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The appropriate studies that determined the shear bond strength values between milled denture base resins and artificial teeth were selected. The initial search identified 103 studies, which were included in the PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews. Three studies met the inclusion criteria, and all of them present a moderate risk of bias (score 6). Two studies found no statistical differences between heat-polymerized and CAD/CAM (milled) denture base materials when attached with different types of artificial teeth, while one study showed higher values of CAD/CAM (milled) denture base materials. Bonding agents ensure bonding strength at least similar to the conventional methods. In order to improve the quality of future studies, it would be advantageous to use a larger number of specimens with standardized dimensions and a blinded testing machine operator to decrease the risk of bias.
“…Compared to heat-polymerized PMMA, as a denture base material, CAD/CAM PMMA disks offer better physical properties and lower wear resistance because of their improved conversion and reduced residual monomer content. However, the lower unpolymerized content of CAD/CAM PMMA disks lowers the bond strength between artificial teeth and the denture base, thereby increasing the risk of the detachment of the artificial teeth [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ].…”
This study investigated the effects of a multifunctional acrylate copolymer—Trimethylolpropane Triacrylate (TMPTA) and Di-pentaerythritol Polyacrylate (A-DPH)—on the mechanical properties of chemically polymerized acrylic resin and its bond strength to a CAD/CAM polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) disk. The methyl methacrylate (MMA) samples were doped with one of the following comonomers: TMPTA, A-DPH, or Trimethylolpropane Trimethacrylate (TMPTMA). The doping ratio ranged from 10 wt% to 50 wt% in 10 wt% increments. The flexural strength (FS) and modulus (FM) of PMMA with and without comonomer doping, as well as the shear bond strength (SBS) between the comonomer-doped PMMA and CAD/CAM PMMA disk, were evaluated. The highest FS (93.2 ± 4.2 MPa) was obtained when doped with 20 wt% of TMPTA. For TMPTMA, the FS decreased with the increase in the doping ratio. For SBS, TMPTA showed almost constant values (ranging from 7.0 to 8.2 MPa) regardless of the doping amount, and A-DPH peaked at 10 wt% doping (8.7 ± 2.2 MPa). TMPTMA showed two peaks at 10 wt% (7.2 ± 2.6 MPa) and 40 wt% (6.5 ± 2.3 MPa). Regarding the failure mode, TMPTMA showed mostly adhesive failure between the CAD/CAM PMMA disk and acrylic resin while TMPTA and A-DPH showed an increased rate of cohesive or mixed failures. Acrylate’s addition as a comonomer to PMMA provided improved mechanical properties and bond strength to the CAD/CAM PMMA disk.
“…The literature is scarce of findings of the bond strength between prefabricated artificial teeth to 3D‐printed denture bases, which represents a viable possibility for clinical practice. Prpić et al 29 evaluated different combinations of denture base resins attached to denture teeth, including CAD‐CAM manufacturing, but no bonding agent was used.…”
The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond strength between two types of artificial teeth with a 3D-printed denture base resin using different bonding agents. Materials and methods: Two types of artificial teeth were evaluated: 3D-printed (Cosmos TEMP) and prefabricated polymethylmethacrylate (Biotone) bonded to cylinders (2.5 mm in height and 5 mm in diameter) of 3D-printed denture bases (Cosmos Den-
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.