2007
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2006-0723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Seven Serum Thyroglobulin Assays in the Follow-Up of Papillary and Follicular Thyroid Cancer Patients

Abstract: Using an assay with a lower functional sensitivity may give an earlier indication of the presence of Tg in the serum on L-T4 treatment and may be used to study the trend in serum Tg without performing any TSH stimulation. Serum Tg determination obtained after TSH stimulation still permits a more reliable assessment of cure and patient's reassurance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
115
2
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
8
115
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Six months following thyroid ablation, an increase in serum onT4-Tg occurred in four and three patients with (ns4) and without (ns191) proven DTC recurrence, respectively (sensitivity 100%, specificity 98%, positive predictive value 98%, negative predictive value 100%, accuracy 98%). Our data agree with those of Schlumberger and co-workers who showed that Tg immunoassays, with a functional sensitivity of 0.2-0.3 ng/mL (comprising the assay employed in our study), are accurate enough to rule out TSH stimulation in the first followup visit of 944 patients with DTC (13). Here, we also show that false positive results were always associated with a spontaneous decrease within 3-6 months, proving that a negative Tg trend has 100% negative predictive value.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Six months following thyroid ablation, an increase in serum onT4-Tg occurred in four and three patients with (ns4) and without (ns191) proven DTC recurrence, respectively (sensitivity 100%, specificity 98%, positive predictive value 98%, negative predictive value 100%, accuracy 98%). Our data agree with those of Schlumberger and co-workers who showed that Tg immunoassays, with a functional sensitivity of 0.2-0.3 ng/mL (comprising the assay employed in our study), are accurate enough to rule out TSH stimulation in the first followup visit of 944 patients with DTC (13). Here, we also show that false positive results were always associated with a spontaneous decrease within 3-6 months, proving that a negative Tg trend has 100% negative predictive value.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This could be an indication that the cut-off value of the old TgAb assay/recovery test was unreliable and that some of the negative Tg was due to the presence of TgAb not detected by the recovery test. However, Schlumberger et al (19) demonstrated that the use of several different TgAb methods and recovery tests for determination of TgAb was also not fully reliable since method-to-method variability existed despite standardization against the WHO standard. The inability to reliably detect interfering TgAb and Tg with different assay methods was also described by Spencer et al (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tg has been reported to be method dependent (56)(57)(58), and the interassay variation can vary between 43% and 65% in healthy subjects (35,57,59). To overcome interassay variation and allow for comparisons between studies, a certified Tg reference material (i.e., CRM-457) has been produced as a quality-control material for assay standardisation (60).…”
Section: Methods To Measure Tg Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 99%