2008
DOI: 10.1080/15487760802186253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Service Outcomes of Case Management Teams With and Without a Consumer Provider

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This had, at times, caused disorder on a team [15, 29]. The results of this research did not reveal any confusion of this type between the CPs and other professionals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This had, at times, caused disorder on a team [15, 29]. The results of this research did not reveal any confusion of this type between the CPs and other professionals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…While some peer workers resisted this as undermining the trust that was at the basis of the relationships they built with service users, others reported feeling more autonomous, confident and assured in their role as a result. Other research has cautioned against the 'socialisation' of peer workers into the working culture around them, through generic training and an overly procedural approach to the role, because of the possibility that the distinctiveness of the role might be lost as a result (Schmidt et al 2008).…”
Section: Risk Management Risk Adversity and Responsibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where peer workers are to be introduced as members of the multidisciplinary mental health team there are arguments in favour of standardising and regulating the role (Stewart 2008). However, others have suggested that such formalisation will undermine the peer 'essence' of the role (Faulkner 2010), that there is a risk of peer workers becoming 'socialised' into the working culture around them, and of the distinctiveness of the role being lost (Schmidt 2008).…”
Section: Distinctiveness Of the Peer Worker Rolementioning
confidence: 99%