2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-10520-3_100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Segmentation Algorithms for the Zebrafish Heart in Fluorescent Microscopy Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3B). Notably, CFIN's ability to segment both cardiac chambers far surpassed those achieved when non-machine learning-based algorithms were applied to images of fluorescent zebrafish hearts at the same developmental stage (Krämer et al, 2009).
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3B). Notably, CFIN's ability to segment both cardiac chambers far surpassed those achieved when non-machine learning-based algorithms were applied to images of fluorescent zebrafish hearts at the same developmental stage (Krämer et al, 2009).
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While various traditional computational approaches exist to automate image segmentation (Sharma and Aggarwal, 2010), many of these methods still require some level of human input and can be limited in their ability to segment and classify distinct, yet similar, structures within biomedical images (Fei et al, 2016; Krämer et al, 2009; Packard et al, 2017). Several of these algorithms, including watershed segmentation, were previously evaluated for their ability to segment fluorescent images of embryonic zebrafish hearts at 48 hours post-fertilization (hpf) (Krämer et al, 2009). While these methods were capable of segmenting whole hearts from background, they failed to consistently delineate individual cardiac chambers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manual segmentation of cardiac images in zebrafish and mice remains the gold standard for ground truth despite being a labor-intensive and error-prone method. Currently existing automatic methods, including adaptive binarization, clustering, voronoi-based segmentation, and watershed, have remained limited [24]. For instance, adaptive histogram thresholding provides a semi-automated computational approach to perform image segmentation; however, the output is detracted by variability in background-to-noise ratio from the standard image processing algorithms [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manual segmentation of cardiac images in zebrafish and mice remains as the gold standard for ground truth despite being a labor-intensive and error-prone method. Currently existing automatic methods, including adaptive binarization, clustering, voronoi-based segmentation, and watershed, have remained limited [24]. For instance, adaptive histogram thresholding provides a semi-automated computational approach to perform image segmentation; however, the output is detracted by variability in background-to-noise ratio from the standard image processing algorithms [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%