1998
DOI: 10.1029/97jc03758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of sea surface flux measured by instrumented aircraft and ship during SOFIA and SEMAPHORE experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this situation (increasing flux and aircraft runs at increasing altitudes) a simple linear extrapolation of the airborne measurements would clearly underestimate the surface heat flux. Such systematic discrepancies between extrapolated fluxes and ground-based measurements were reported several times (Betts et al, 1990(Betts et al, , 1992Grunwald et al, 1996;Durand et al, 1998), and an overview was given by Isaac et al (2004). Systematic measurement errors (e.g.…”
Section: Box Flightsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this situation (increasing flux and aircraft runs at increasing altitudes) a simple linear extrapolation of the airborne measurements would clearly underestimate the surface heat flux. Such systematic discrepancies between extrapolated fluxes and ground-based measurements were reported several times (Betts et al, 1990(Betts et al, , 1992Grunwald et al, 1996;Durand et al, 1998), and an overview was given by Isaac et al (2004). Systematic measurement errors (e.g.…”
Section: Box Flightsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Applying the simple box flight pattern, the number of legs n = 4. Assuming a linear heat flux profile in the CBL the area-averaged fluxes are then extrapolated to the ground (e.g., Durand et al, 1998).…”
Section: Box Flightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although AMMA was the first scientific campaign during which the plane was operated, the measurement systems and data processing were quite similar to those used on the previous aircraft (e.g. Lambert and Durand, 1998;Durand et al, 1998;Saïd et al, 2005). According to their response time, the signals delivered by the various sensors were generally recorded at a rate ranging from 1 to 50 s −1 .…”
Section: Instrumentation and Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluxes used in this study were filtered values. On the high-frequency range a resolution of 16 s -• is sufficient to achieve a good description of the transfers [Durand et al, 1998]. The sensors must thus have a fast enough response time to capture frequencies at the upper end of the cospectra, while covariance averaging times must be long enough to include frequencies at the lower end [Lenschow and Stankov, 1986;Mahrt, 1997].…”
Section: Actually X'y'= Lim 1 Ix' (T)y' (T)dtmentioning
confidence: 99%