2019
DOI: 10.1186/s40880-019-0388-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of screening strategies for Lynch syndrome in patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer: a prospective cohort study in China

Abstract: Background The prevalence of Lynch syndrome and screening strategies for this disorder in Chinese patients with endometrial cancer have seldom been investigated. Such data would be essential for the screening, prevention, genetic counseling, and treatment of Lynch syndrome. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the accuracy of the mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry (IHC), microsatellite instability (MSI) test, and clinical diagnostic criteria in screening for Lynch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immunohistochemistry IHC was performed as described previously (11). The tissues were incubated with primary antibody against IGF2BP2 (ab128175, Abcam, 1:100) overnight in the refrigerator at 4°C.…”
Section: M6a Rna Methylation Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunohistochemistry IHC was performed as described previously (11). The tissues were incubated with primary antibody against IGF2BP2 (ab128175, Abcam, 1:100) overnight in the refrigerator at 4°C.…”
Section: M6a Rna Methylation Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk of bias was high in two or more domains for six studies (85.7%) [17][18][19][20][21][22]. The remaining study was at unclear risk of bias in five domains, and low risk of bias in two domains [23].…”
Section: Complete Test Accuracymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…No study was at low risk of bias in all domains. In the patient selection domain, there was a high risk of bias in 85.7% of studies (6/7 studies) [17][18][19][20][21][22]. In the index test domain, all studies were rated as having unclear risk of bias for IHC [17][18][19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Complete Test Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations