2022
DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.15010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of DNA extraction techniques for the recovery of bovine DNA from fly larvae crops

Abstract: Forensic entomology aids investigations using insects and is primarily associated with the estimation of post-mortem interval (PMI). Studies have shown that human DNA can be recovered from the crops of fly larvae. While several factors regarding the recovery of human DNA from crops have been studied, DNA extraction methods have not been thoroughly assessed. Determining a method for optimal extraction could aid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(86 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The qPCR assay implemented for pre-screening includes a competitive IAC to reduce the hands-on work and less pipetting of reagents, while increasing the confidence in the results by assuring lack of reaction inhibition (Rip and Gouws, 2009 ). It is worth noting that no qPCR inhibition was observed in any of the samples analyzed, most likely due to the two-step enrichment method which reduces the food debris transferred to the final sample, along with the implementation of the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro kit, which has been reported to be highly efficient in removing PCR inhibitors, such as humic acid, from a wide variety of samples (Pearman et al, 2020 ; Magnani, 2021 ; Cantu et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The qPCR assay implemented for pre-screening includes a competitive IAC to reduce the hands-on work and less pipetting of reagents, while increasing the confidence in the results by assuring lack of reaction inhibition (Rip and Gouws, 2009 ). It is worth noting that no qPCR inhibition was observed in any of the samples analyzed, most likely due to the two-step enrichment method which reduces the food debris transferred to the final sample, along with the implementation of the DNeasy PowerSoil Pro kit, which has been reported to be highly efficient in removing PCR inhibitors, such as humic acid, from a wide variety of samples (Pearman et al, 2020 ; Magnani, 2021 ; Cantu et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial DNA was first extracted using the EZ1 DNeasy Blood Tissue Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) [ 32 ]. The absorbance measurements for DNA purity ranged from 260 to 280 nm (Spectrophotometer ND-100, Nanodrop Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extracted DNA was preserved at −20 • C. Before the DNA extraction of insect meals, removal of fat and oils, independent of their processing method, was carried out. This step was added because the lipid concentration of insects [44] could interfere in DNA extraction process [45] and inhibit PCR [46]. The fat and oil extraction process involved resuspending 10 mg of sample in methanol-chloroform-water (2:1:0.8) for one day and then washing in distilled water and PBS 1× buffer to eliminate the remains of the solution previously used.…”
Section: Sample Processing and Dna Extractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%