2017
DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of CT images with average intensity projection, free breathing, and mid‐ventilation for dose calculation in lung cancer

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to compare three computed tomography (CT) images under different conditions—average intensity projection (AIP), free breathing (FB), mid‐ventilation (MidV)—used for radiotherapy contouring and planning in lung cancer patients. Two image sets derived from four‐dimensional CT (4DCT) acquisition (AIP and MidV) and three‐dimensional CT with FB were generated and used to plan for 29 lung cancer patients. Organs at risk (OARs) were delineated for each image. AIP images were calculated w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have established that radiotherapy based on 4D-CT simulation enhances the accuracy of dosage and determines the locations of tumour(s) and OAR in the chest and abdomen (926,33). Certain previous studies have compared the composite methods of 4D-CT radiotherapy for lung cancer and liver cancer (9,17,20,2326,33); however, at present, to the best of our knowldege, there is no study that has been published in English, which has investigated the same for breast cancer. To the best of the our knowledge, the present study is the first to compare the target volume and dosimetric differences between the 3D-CT radiotherapy plan and four 4D-CT radiotherapy plans (T00, T50, MIP and AIP plans) for whole breast radiotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have established that radiotherapy based on 4D-CT simulation enhances the accuracy of dosage and determines the locations of tumour(s) and OAR in the chest and abdomen (926,33). Certain previous studies have compared the composite methods of 4D-CT radiotherapy for lung cancer and liver cancer (9,17,20,2326,33); however, at present, to the best of our knowldege, there is no study that has been published in English, which has investigated the same for breast cancer. To the best of the our knowledge, the present study is the first to compare the target volume and dosimetric differences between the 3D-CT radiotherapy plan and four 4D-CT radiotherapy plans (T00, T50, MIP and AIP plans) for whole breast radiotherapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Image centers were defined as the medial point in the three‐dimensional volume. DRRs have proved to be suitable for contour delineation of anatomical structures 14,15 . DRRs were generated 16 for each of the 3D crops of the dataset in the lateral plane.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DRRs have proved to be suitable for contour delineation of anatomical structures. 14,15 DRRs were generated 16 for each of the 3D crops of the dataset in the lateral plane. Figure 4 shows DRRs of knee and hip crops of two different patients.…”
Section: C Digitally Reconstructed Radiographsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other image sets may be superior in terms of accurate dosimetry, when measurements are compared to TPS calculation . The various CT reconstructions as a basis for dose calculation are to some degree shown to be equivalent in terms of dosimetric accuracy and anatomical representation . In the current study, we seek to determine whether optimizing and calculating plans based on different CT reconstructions has an impact on plan robustness, in terms of dosimetric deviations due to respiration‐induced target motion during treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%