1998
DOI: 10.1177/003754979807100501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Scheduling Rules in a Flow Shop with Multiple Processors: A Simulation

Abstract: Provo, UtahThis simulation study investigated the effect on mean flow time and makespan of localized scheduling rules with dynamically established priorities in a flow shop with multiple processors. The study examined the effects of problem characteristics (number of jobs, number of machine stages and number of parallel processors at each stage) and the performance of priority rules using regression analysis. Although structural characteristics explained most of the variation in performance, priority rules als… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance [25] compares 10 dispatching rules for the m-stage problem with the maximum tardiness criterion. Later, in [28], simulation studies are carried out to further analyze the performance of dispatching rules for the same problem with the makespan and the maximum tardiness objectives. Simulation was also employed to analyze the effectiveness of dispatching rules in [57].…”
Section: Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance [25] compares 10 dispatching rules for the m-stage problem with the maximum tardiness criterion. Later, in [28], simulation studies are carried out to further analyze the performance of dispatching rules for the same problem with the makespan and the maximum tardiness objectives. Simulation was also employed to analyze the effectiveness of dispatching rules in [57].…”
Section: Heuristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Q(SPT) (Allahverdi and Al-Anzi, 2006;Barman, 1997;Brah and Wheeler, 1998;Jayamohan and Rajendran, 2000;Han et al, 2018;Fernandez-Viagas et al, 2018a;Hunsucker and Shah, 1992). Jobs are first ordered in each stage according to non-decreasing order of their completion times in the previous stage.…”
Section: Background: Solution Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from these heuristics, two very commonly used dispatching, or priority rules are also used, namely, the Shortest Processing Time (SPT) and the Longest Processing Time (LPT). In the studies by Brah, Santos and Hunsucker (1989), Hunsucker and Shah (1994) and Brah and Wheeler (1998), SPT proves to be the best priority rule for the makespan criteria among the other usual dispatching techniques.…”
Section: The Fsmp Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%