2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10811-017-1175-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Scenedesmus acuminatus and Chlorella vulgaris cultivation in liquid digestates from anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper industry and municipal wastewater treatment sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
28
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
8
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the lower biomass production and nutrient removal, the growth of C. vulgaris appeared to be more sensitive to cultivation conditions than A. platensis. Similar findings were noted by Tao et al [38], who compared the growth of Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus acuminatus in liquid digestates.…”
Section: Nutrient Removal and Digestate Treatment Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the lower biomass production and nutrient removal, the growth of C. vulgaris appeared to be more sensitive to cultivation conditions than A. platensis. Similar findings were noted by Tao et al [38], who compared the growth of Chlorella vulgaris and Scenedesmus acuminatus in liquid digestates.…”
Section: Nutrient Removal and Digestate Treatment Efficiencysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In DLD medium, COD concentration was not as high as in CLD, and interestingly, there was a positive relationship between the initial COD concentration and final biomass production. It could be associated with the presence of microbial communities from inoculum that may enhance the growth of microalgae [38]. Bacterial cultures were introduced into photobioreactors along with the inoculum from a hybrid photobioreactors, where the biomass was cultivated and adapted to anaerobic digestate.…”
Section: Microalgal Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, microalgae uptake CO 2 for their growth. This requirement was calculated taking into account the carbon removal rate, total cultivation area, and CO 2 capture efficiency, which was assumed to be 80% [71,72]. On the other hand, CO 2 is released in the CHP unit.…”
Section: Sustainability Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biochemical compounds of each polyculture species for estimating biocrude oil yield was taken from literatures. All polyculture species have a nearly similar composition with 34-49.5% lipids, 36.3-41.5% carbohydrates, and 14.2-27.5% proteins (Supplementary material Appendix 2) [33][34][35][36]. These three components are considered as biocrude oil resources for estimating biofuel yield.Therefore, an insignificant quantity of other compounds, such as RNA/DNA material, is negligible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%