2022
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Viral Loads in the Nasal Mucosa of Patients Infected With BA.1, BA.2, or BA.5 Omicron Lineages

Abstract: Lower viral loads were observed in the upper respiratory tract of patients infected with the BA.1 whereas patients infected with BA.2 and BA.5 had comparable viral loads to those seen with Alpha or Delta. This suggests viral loads are not likely responsible for the increased transmission of the Omicron lineages.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The symptoms of ‘runny nose’ and ‘cough’ occurred significantly more frequently in BA.2- and BA.5-infected individuals than in BA.1 cases. One possible explanation for this could be that there is evidence that patients infected with the BA.2 and BA.5 sub-lineages have a higher upper respiratory viral load compared to patients infected with BA.1 [ 14 , 15 ]. However, in accordance with the results of Whitaker et al [ 24 ], respiratory symptoms were the most prominent in all three sub-lineages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The symptoms of ‘runny nose’ and ‘cough’ occurred significantly more frequently in BA.2- and BA.5-infected individuals than in BA.1 cases. One possible explanation for this could be that there is evidence that patients infected with the BA.2 and BA.5 sub-lineages have a higher upper respiratory viral load compared to patients infected with BA.1 [ 14 , 15 ]. However, in accordance with the results of Whitaker et al [ 24 ], respiratory symptoms were the most prominent in all three sub-lineages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences between BA.5 and BA.2 could also be observed in terms of BA.5 having a higher transmissibility and being more pathogenic than BA.2. Additionally, the genetic differences among the Omicron subvariants could also imply potential differences in clinical presentations, probably caused by different viral loads in the respiratory tract [14,15]. However, despite the data on mortality [16], direct comparisons of the symptoms caused by BA.1 and BA.2 infections are rare, but suggest somewhat milder symptoms in BA.1 infections [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples that were positive for SARS-CoV-2 using reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction testing with a cycle threshold less than 30 cycles underwent whole-genome sequencing, as has been previously described . In a single center, the Illumina platform was used, and data consensus sequences and variants were called using FreeBayes .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples that were positive for SARS-CoV-2 using reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction testing with a cycle threshold less than 30 cycles underwent whole-genome sequencing, as has been previously described. 10 In a single center, the Illumina platform was used, and data consensus sequences and variants were called using FreeBayes. 11 The other 3 centers used the Oxford Nanopore Technologies platform, with Nanopore v3 Midnight primers using the native barcode, ARTIC SARS-CoV-2 bioinformatic protocol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%