2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2015.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of sample pretreatment methods for the determination of multiple phytohormones in plant samples by liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(75 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The identification and assignation of each compounds was performed by comparing their retention times and UV spectra to authentic standards and also confirmed by an Agilent 6430 LC-MS/MS spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization source. The electrospray ionization mass spectrometry detection was performed in negative mode with the following optimized parameters: capillary temperature 400°C; drying gas N 2 12 L/min; nebulizer pressure, 45 psi (Fecka and Turek 2008;Cui et al 2015). Data gaining was performed using multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) method that only monitors specific mass transitions during preset retention times.…”
Section: Lc-dad-esi-ms/ms Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification and assignation of each compounds was performed by comparing their retention times and UV spectra to authentic standards and also confirmed by an Agilent 6430 LC-MS/MS spectrometer equipped with an electrospray ionization source. The electrospray ionization mass spectrometry detection was performed in negative mode with the following optimized parameters: capillary temperature 400°C; drying gas N 2 12 L/min; nebulizer pressure, 45 psi (Fecka and Turek 2008;Cui et al 2015). Data gaining was performed using multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) method that only monitors specific mass transitions during preset retention times.…”
Section: Lc-dad-esi-ms/ms Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ion source allows large, non-volatile molecules to be analyzed directly from the liquid phase, which ionizes the neutral atom or molecule and fragment the ion beam generated from it [93]. Two of the frequently used ion sources in plant hormone analysis are electrospray ionization (ESI) and atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI).…”
Section: Lc-ms Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) and liquid–liquid microextraction (LLME), hollow fibre-based liquid–liquid–liquid microextraction (HF–LLLME) and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) have been used previously for IAA purification [1420]. Solid-phase extraction (SPE) and antibody-based immune methods have recently become widely used to extract and purify IAA [6, 2126]. Optimized solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and double-layered SPE (DL/SPE) resulted in a higher level of recovery and better ability to remove pigments [27, 28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since modern SPE/SPME techniques are usually applied online coupled with HPLC, the current emphasis involves choosing various sorbents for trapping analytes [30, 31]. Many commercial SPE/SPME columns based on different sorbents have been widely used for high-throughput phytohormone extraction and purification from crude plant extracts [22, 23, 26]. However, commercial SPE columns for multiple phytohormones, such as Sep-Pak C18, Oasis HLB, Oasis MCX and Oasis MAX, are not designed specifically for phytohormones such as IAA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%