2012
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2012.2207346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of S-Band Radar Attenuation Prediction With Beacon Measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11] presents the relationship between reflectivity and all parameters and coefficients in all data in all places and all times of precipitation, respectively. However, previous studies have determined the relationship between reflectivity and rainfall amount based on power regression [3,4,14,17,24,25,27,[31][32][33][34]. But, it is possible that the relationship could be manifested in other matrix form such as; logarithmic or exponential regression.…”
Section: Calibration Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[11] presents the relationship between reflectivity and all parameters and coefficients in all data in all places and all times of precipitation, respectively. However, previous studies have determined the relationship between reflectivity and rainfall amount based on power regression [3,4,14,17,24,25,27,[31][32][33][34]. But, it is possible that the relationship could be manifested in other matrix form such as; logarithmic or exponential regression.…”
Section: Calibration Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 100 relationships are available for different rainfall forms such as strait form, tropical, convective, thunderstorm, shower, monsoon and hurricanes [9]. The sensitivity variation of Z-R relationships are the main uncertainty sources [17], especially in rainfall calculation based on drop size distribution (DSD). Because of radar measurements carry many uncertainty sources depending on dissimilarities of radar reflectivity in the atmosphere; radar calibration is unavoidable, in order to estimate the amount of rainfall precisely [18,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 shows the parameters of selected Z-R relations. Yeo et al (2012) had identified that the root mean square (RMS) error between beacon measurements and radar-estimated attenuation using the Z-R relation proposed by Kumar et al (2011) is the smallest compared to that of others. Due to climatic similarity and the short distance of about 200 km between Singapore and our location of interest (Kuala Lumpur), the Z-R relation proposed by Kumar et al (2011) is adopted in this analysis.…”
Section: Selection Of Z-r Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 100 relationships are available for different rainfall form such as strait form, tropical, convective, thunderstorm, shower, monsoon and hurricanes [7]. The sensitivity variation of Z-R relationships are the main uncertainty sources [13], especially in rainfall calculation based on DSD. Because of radar measurements carry many uncertainty sources depending on dissimilarities of radar reflectivity in the atmosphere; Radar calibration is unavoidable to estimate the amount of rainfall precisely [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%