2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of risk patterns in carcinoma and melanoma of the skin in men: a multi-centre case–case–control study

Abstract: We directly compared risk factors between 214 histologically confirmed melanomas (CMM), 215 basal-cell carcinomas (BCC) and 139 squamous-cell carcinomas (SCC) in a multiple case -case -control study with 349 controls from patients without dermatological disease admitted to the same hospitals. Subjects with fair hair had a significant risk increase for all types of tumours at a comparable level (OR adj for blonde hair: CMM 2.3; SCC 2.4; BCC 2.3). The effect of pale eyes was significant and similar for CMM and B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
115
1
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
115
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…7,37 Rosso et al 37 observed risks for BCC and CMM associated with skin type ⁄tendency to sunburn that were comparable with those observed here, but whereas Rosso et al showed an increased risk associated with childhood sunburn only for CMM, we found increased risk for all three types of skin cancer, with OR of about 2AE5-fold increased in multivariate analyses. Similar to other studies, 37,38 we observed no increased risk for CMM related to outdoor occupation in multivariate analyses, but we did observe increased risks for SCC and BCC with outdoor occupation in line with some 38,39 but not all 37 previous studies. Many commonly used drugs may increase cutaneous photosensitivity and some have been shown to increase skin cancer risk.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…7,37 Rosso et al 37 observed risks for BCC and CMM associated with skin type ⁄tendency to sunburn that were comparable with those observed here, but whereas Rosso et al showed an increased risk associated with childhood sunburn only for CMM, we found increased risk for all three types of skin cancer, with OR of about 2AE5-fold increased in multivariate analyses. Similar to other studies, 37,38 we observed no increased risk for CMM related to outdoor occupation in multivariate analyses, but we did observe increased risks for SCC and BCC with outdoor occupation in line with some 38,39 but not all 37 previous studies. Many commonly used drugs may increase cutaneous photosensitivity and some have been shown to increase skin cancer risk.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…12 For squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in particular, the risk increases linearly with total sun exposure. [13][14][15][16] In Australia, the lifetime risk of developing melanoma or nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) is 1 in 30 17 and 1 in 2, 18 respectively. This high risk is reflective of high levels of UV exposure in a predominantly fair-skinned population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite undisputed association between UVR exposure and cutaneous neoplasms, an exact relationship between the amount, pattern, and timing of exposure to UVR and the subsequent development of specific skin malignancies is not yet fully understood. Popular belief is that a crucial factor for the formation of SCC is cumulative lifetime sun exposure, while it is less important for the development of BCC, in which an intermittent solar exposure rather than chronic one may be more prejudicial etiologic determinant [1,[18][19][20]. Even association between morphologic markers of cutaneous photodamage and an increased risk of BCC has been proven only moderate [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even association between morphologic markers of cutaneous photodamage and an increased risk of BCC has been proven only moderate [21]. As for cutaneous MM, an intermittent intense sun exposure was shown to play considerable role as risk factor, whereas a high occupational sun exposure seemed to be inversely associated to MM development [1,18,20,[22][23][24]. As a consequence, individual cancer types have different predominant anatomic locations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%